3 tin dust, 1 shiny dust and 1 bucket of liquid ender for 4 enderium dust.
You need 2 Pyrothium dust (forgot the exact name) to smelt all 4 enderium dust into Enderium Ingots.
4 Enderium Ingots, 4 Hardened Glass and 1 Diamond makes 1 Empty Tesseract Frame. You need 4 Ender Pearls melted into Liquid Ender to fill one frame.
Then you need 4 silver ingots and 4 bronze ingots around the filled tesseract frames for 1 active Tesseract.
Interesting, the new cofh site doesnt give the recipe. Seems harder to make them. Kind of suprises me, I usually get told people dont like things being made more expensive. No one seems bothered by this though. I like that they seem harder to make.
Honest question though, why do people get upset over 'making machines to make other machines to make other machines' with IC2, but this procedure is not considered bad? To make one block, you need other blocks. People say 'you need a hammer and snips to make wire and it sucks' but then here someone could say 'you need an induction smelter just to make this special glass, then you have to make this frame, then another whole machine just to fill that frame with ender pearls, instead of just crafting 4 ender pearls with a frame to get a filled one. And you have to melt the pearls with this third machine.
Why not just craft regular glass with a diamond to make a frame? Craft the frame with 4 ender pearls to get a filled frame. Then craft the filled frame with some metal to finish it. its not about cost, because you could increase cost just by using two crafting steps. Like this:
Step 1: a diamond block with 4 glass and 4 obsidian to make a frame. Step 2: 4 ender pearls and 4 silver blocks with that frame to make a teseract. honestly... this sound better to me. Id actually love it was 1 glass and 4 diamond blocks and 4 obsidian. Everyone says they have no use for all the diamonds they accumulate... wouldnt it be nice to have a way to use them?
And this method seems much less... tedious... dont you think? Now i have my tesseract and didnt spend so much time in front of a Gui, and its even more expensive. Or at least could be made comparable in cost easily. Im honestly curious why this is considered good design, but IC2 is not. Maybe IC2 went too FAR with their steps (very possible), but the response I get is that 'I dont want to make machines just so i can make other machines." Isnt this what all mods do? If so, why is the TE3 tech progression ok when it could obviously be made less 'tedious' but IC2's progression is not?