Half slab mother f-----ucking lighting glitches.
Tico half slab work bench and furnaces not stacking
Half slab mother f-----ucking lighting glitches.
I personally prefer antimatter...Its so much cooler looking (and destructive) lol.Uranium?
Well-played, sir. Though, if I remember correctly, anti-matter does require quite a large setup...if we're talking about Atomic Science.I personally prefer antimatter...Its so much cooler looking (and destructive) lol.
Well-played, sir. Though, if I remember correctly, anti-matter does require quite a large setup...if we're talking about Atomic Science.
I prefer a massive capacitor bank being fed power through a link between dimensions where I harness the infinite power-generating potential of Hell itself.
That's just nonsense.Tico half slab work bench and furnaces not stacking
It's nonsense that they don't stack, and nonsense I think they should? :SBoth?
Wait...we werent talking about IRL? Jk, my preferred powergen is big reactors...make a huge reactor under you base, and watch those resonant energy cells fill (If you do it right, you can fill a resonant cell in under 15 seconds.)Well-played, sir. Though, if I remember correctly, anti-matter does require quite a large setup...if we're talking about Atomic Science.
I prefer a massive capacitor bank being fed power through a link between dimensions where I harness the infinite power-generating potential of Hell itself.
Wait...we werent talking about IRL? Jk, my preferred powergen is big reactors...make a huge reactor under you base, and watch those resonant energy cells fill (If you do it right, you can fill a resonant cell in under 15 seconds.)
SureIt's nonsense that they don't stack, and nonsense I think they should? :S
If you guys still worry about power storage, instead of creating a continuous-distribution network based on connection-quantity priority, you are doing it wrong.[DOUBLEPOST=1407267413][/DOUBLEPOST]
Sure
Don't make me whip out my reactorcraft power plant and waggle it in your face.
*cough*
The ~40kRF/t i've got outputting through rotational dynamos is more than enough to fill all my available RF power storage and it's only a measly fraction of the total power i'm churning out.
Several extractors kept very happy with about a GW each.
Don't get me wrong, I love me some BigReactors but weight for weight ReC is THE power solution these days
If you guys still worry about power storage, instead of creating a continuous-distribution network based on connection-quantity priority, you are doing it wrong.[DOUBLEPOST=1407267413][/DOUBLEPOST]
Sure
Gotta love the rotarycraft powergen, but I've never really gotten into it.
But how about IC2 reactors...I just realized power converters is still an option. *Testing*
Gotta love the rotarycraft powergen, but I've never really gotten into it.
But how about IC2 reactors...I just realized power converters is still an option.
Edit: max size plutonium reactor makes up to 40k rf/t as well, because, why not?
Lol I usually just make ****loads of power and drain it all into quarries...then you get the fun of maxing out power production without wasting it
Actually, there is now an EV (extreme voltage) converter that takes ANY power quantity.Power converters is buggy in 1.6
Like "randomly stop transmitting power for no goddam reason" buggy.
Oh and i think there's an upper limit on the eu/t you can shove through even the top tier converter these days (might be wrong on that, I haven't used IC2 in months )
Unless you profusely use tesseracts, it also means you have to think about how you design your base, instead of throwing down multiple power gens with energy cell buffers all over the base. You can have them all contribute to the same network, maximizing your efficiency.
This is how the real world works.