There's was no guarantee that the wolves didn't directly targeted Sketch themselves as they wouldn't want to have their kill redirected. There was no indication in the_j's recap that states Sketch was distracting the wolves- screaming != was distracting wolves, screaming == getting turned into a human sashimi by wolves. And the wolves did kill tonight, the victim was RealSketch. There's no wolves roles that would allow the wolves to kill a extra villager.
I think that you are one of the wolves, voting on me based on what you said makes sense but locking it doesn't. You stated yourself that there's little evidence for your statement, why lock it when there's a high chance you're wrong?
I suspect that you and the other wolves targeted Sketch last night and selected me to use as scapegoat. With Sketch as the jester, you could have easily said that Sketch planned to distract me, got killed because of that, and start a bandwagon- which is what's happening.
Vote RJS, my reason is stated above. I won't be locking, even if I'm fairly certain that you are a wolf now, as there is still not much evidence for my claim.
There's little evidence for my statement that I can show within the limits of this game. There's no wolf role that allows them to kill an extra villager, but as explained above, there doesn't have to be. If Sketch did what he said he would, then you are a wolf. If he did not, you might be a wolf. As any of the rest of us might also be wolves, the fact is that right now you are the person who is most likely to be a wolf.
Your version of events is a nice one, but if I were a wolf and had done that then, as stated above, I die tomorrow. From a wolf perspective, that's not a good way of doing things. As a wolf, I would have no need to single you out with an elaborate story and in doing so draw a lot of attention to myself. All the wolves have to do is avoid being lynched. Launching an action like this against a villager would result in what 016Nojr said. As a wolf, I wouldn't risk my neck when I could sit back, see which way the suspicions were flowing and steer them towards the innocents while killing another every night.
Why would you be needed as a scapegoat in your scenario? Everyone knew that Sketch would be targeted by the wolves, as his was the only surviving role that lets us see who's a wolf and who isn't. Killing him via wolf attack leaves no trails back to the wolves and is entirely riskless. By contrast, you claim that I (and the other wolves) set up an elaborate scheme that works once all game and ends in the death of a wolf? I appreciate that this is my first game, and if I were working alone in your scenario then you might convince people that I'd set up such a scheme without thinking it through, but you claim that the other wolves would go along with such a bad way of doing things despite having a fair bit of experience?