To be fair, TC 4.1 has a native object that has Victus and nothing else in the Victus chain... but it also has Vintium(sic)(taint).
The Thaumcraft 4.1 Experience
- Thread starter MigukNamja
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Yeah, I'm not going near taint, especially when Demo is planning harder taint for Technomancy.
Fine, you hug the tainted creeper! I tangled with a couple of tainted chickens on my recent jaunt... I'd seen them in creative, but they were still surprisingly intimidating in survival. Kinda like those baby zombies, come to think of it.
Play a few Zelda games. The mere sight of a chicken can induce PTSD nowadays.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
I have a question regarding auto-alchemy. I'm trying to automate Alumentum for my boiler and all works fine except that thing spits out the alumentum in the front. I don't like having a chest there and Itemducts don't work (it just spits the alumentum next to the pipes).
Is there a sane way to import the alumentum in my AE network while keeping the awesome look of the contraption? I haven't tested a ME interface, yet but that would just be as ugly as the chest.
Is there a sane way to import the alumentum in my AE network while keeping the awesome look of the contraption? I haven't tested a ME interface, yet but that would just be as ugly as the chest.
Hoppers are a little less ugly and more in keeping with the aesthetics of the construct. An import bus pointing up at the under-side wouldn't look too bad.
Or, Hungry Chest.
Last edited:
Hopper is a good idea, but still too dominant. Is there no smaller block with inventory?
I thought of golems and hungry chest, too. but I don't like spilled items because I use to play with active magnet. I already have lots of wild chicken in the trees around my base throwing eggs at me every time I pass by
If I'd do such a solution, I'd do it the buildcraft way using a vacuum pipe. I'm a bit oldschool on that
I'll test BC pipes later, perhaps they work. It's far more steampunky than ducts anyways.
I thought of golems and hungry chest, too. but I don't like spilled items because I use to play with active magnet. I already have lots of wild chicken in the trees around my base throwing eggs at me every time I pass by
If I'd do such a solution, I'd do it the buildcraft way using a vacuum pipe
. I'm a bit oldschool on thatI'll test BC pipes later, perhaps they work. It's far more steampunky than ducts anyways.
Can obsidian pipes suck items through facades? Can you also improve the range of obsidian pipes with autarchic gates? If the answer to at least the first of those questions is true then they will probably make a really good solution.
BC pipes don't work either.
I placed a vacuum hopper in front of the crucible (one block below the porthole). Looks great and the alumentum is only visible for a few ticks bevore it's sucked into the hopper. Too fast for the magnet.
Now you see the steam coming out of the alchemy construct and the particle effects of the hopper add additional atmosphere. *yay*
Obsidian pipe should be able to suck through facades (they even suck through solid blocks) but I think the gate wouldn't work (this needs testing) to extend the range. Those pipes need MJ to be extended and the gate doesn't emit that. CJ powers the pipes in his mobtrap with hobbyist steam engines.
I placed a vacuum hopper in front of the crucible (one block below the porthole). Looks great and the alumentum is only visible for a few ticks bevore it's sucked into the hopper. Too fast for the magnet.
Now you see the steam coming out of the alchemy construct and the particle effects of the hopper add additional atmosphere. *yay*
Obsidian pipe should be able to suck through facades (they even suck through solid blocks) but I think the gate wouldn't work (this needs testing) to extend the range. Those pipes need MJ to be extended and the gate doesn't emit that. CJ powers the pipes in his mobtrap with hobbyist steam engines.
Someone will have to actually mess around with it. I will just wait personally. I'm over dealing with early versions. I was using TC4 from the day it went public and have gone through ALL of the changes. I'll let someone else deal with alpha/beta testing.
TL;DR Just wait a few weeks, someone will test it.
Someone will have to actually mess around with it. I will just wait personally. I'm over dealing with early versions. I was using TC4 from the day it went public and have gone through ALL of the changes. I'll let someone else deal with alpha/beta testing.
TL;DR Just wait a few weeks, someone will test it.
I've actually been playing TC4 in 1.7 a lot
.To answer @Feniks question: I saw 2 nodes practically right next to eachother, and one is a lot bigger. It basically just ''steals'' the vis from the lesser node, keeping that one small. The big boy has not yet destroyed the small node, but I am fairly sure it won't do that. AKA not entirely sure, but probably no node merging.
Nah mergings sort of a chance kind of thing... Eventually it might merge.. Though I do wonder did the big node ever drain the small node down to zero? If so maybe that's the illusion of node merging....I've actually been playing TC4 in 1.7 a lot
To answer @Feniks question: I saw 2 nodes practically right next to eachother, and one is a lot bigger. It basically just ''steals'' the vis from the lesser node, keeping that one small. The big boy has not yet destroyed the small node, but I am fairly sure it won't do that. AKA not entirely sure, but probably no node merging.