gregtech block breaker nerf
- Thread starter damonster81
- Start date
- Status
Please continue to drone on, I'm sure everyone likes hearing you speak as much as you do yourself.
Meanwhile today I hit my 250th post like. To be quite honest I'm as baffled as you are. I certainly don't get it either! But I guess like Smaug, I'm gonna sit here on my pile of internet treasure totally oblivious to its value, unable to spend it, yet acutely aware of how much of it I have. I'd just put me on ignore and let me chatter at the void if I were you. Actually I would have done that about 4 posts ago...
He was speaking about ''you need to delete the configs in every update'' so I said that.
So.
I can say, "I dislike this" and others can say the same thing, and say that it is disrespectful, and should not be done.
And the most common reply is, "it can be done, so it gets done" and "don't white knight" but that does not address things properly.
And people act like there is nothing wrong?
Consistently any time anybody has made changes, or asked about changes, the answer has always been that the author of the mod has her own vision, and does not want it added to, reinterpreted, or changed. How is altering the result of a blockbreaker not a change? How is it not interference? And thus, how is it not rude?
Okay, so maybe gt is worth it, even with the rude behavior, or maybe most people just don't care as long as they get an end product that they can live with. I just thought FTB has higher standards.
I can say, "I dislike this" and others can say the same thing, and say that it is disrespectful, and should not be done.
And the most common reply is, "it can be done, so it gets done" and "don't white knight" but that does not address things properly.
And people act like there is nothing wrong?
Consistently any time anybody has made changes, or asked about changes, the answer has always been that the author of the mod has her own vision, and does not want it added to, reinterpreted, or changed. How is altering the result of a blockbreaker not a change? How is it not interference? And thus, how is it not rude?
Okay, so maybe gt is worth it, even with the rude behavior, or maybe most people just don't care as long as they get an end product that they can live with. I just thought FTB has higher standards.
There is nothing wrong with modders modifying games and allowing those mods to be applied to other peoples games. Full Stop. No discussion.
Nothing changes just because that game is an already modified game.
Unless by this you mean the recipe, GregTech does not mess with blockbreaker behavior as far as I know.
So, if I made something, and I said, "don't change it" it wouldn't be wrong if somebody changed it?
Feels bad to me.
Feels bad to me.
he doesn't change the recipe at redpower's, he changes minecraft's way to read the recipe, or something like that.
like, there is a box (recipe), and you can't touch it, but you put a fake box (another recipe) in front of it so the person that comes to 'grab the box' (minecraft to load the recipe) it grabs the first, fake one.
Yes, I see that you understand how it works, but I also see that you don't understand that I think the interference is rude.
It's technologically possible, just like so many other things, but it does not make it polite.
The standards of politeness are higher then legal requirements, higher then technical ability, and higher then even moral standards.
Not everybody is going to be polite, I know this. Not everybody is going to be moral, I understand this. Not everybody is going to be legal, I comprehend that. Some people are going to do it, just because they can.
It's still not polite.
If asked to not interfere with X, Y, Z. And then you produce the same exact effect as if you'd interfered with X, Y, or Z. You've still gone against the stated wishes of another person.
I'm not saying it's impossible.
I'm not saying it's illegal.
I'm not even saying that it's immoral.
I'm just saying it's rude.
I understand that you might not agree, and that's okay, I'm just keeping a higher standard. My big complaint is that I thought FTB was about keeping a higher standard.
Go ahead, tell me that I thought wrong, go ahead, break my heart.
It's technologically possible, just like so many other things, but it does not make it polite.
The standards of politeness are higher then legal requirements, higher then technical ability, and higher then even moral standards.
Not everybody is going to be polite, I know this. Not everybody is going to be moral, I understand this. Not everybody is going to be legal, I comprehend that. Some people are going to do it, just because they can.
It's still not polite.
If asked to not interfere with X, Y, Z. And then you produce the same exact effect as if you'd interfered with X, Y, or Z. You've still gone against the stated wishes of another person.
I'm not saying it's impossible.
I'm not saying it's illegal.
I'm not even saying that it's immoral.
I'm just saying it's rude.
I understand that you might not agree, and that's okay, I'm just keeping a higher standard. My big complaint is that I thought FTB was about keeping a higher standard.
Go ahead, tell me that I thought wrong, go ahead, break my heart.
I do not agree? dude, I hate greg and his nerfs! whatever he does, even if me makes rain be diamonds, will be wrong at my eyes, but yeah, I do find it rude, just like him changing every recipe he doesn't need to touch.
greg needs to learn from people like Immibis, he can (and he did) make his microblocks work with redpower's pneumatics, but he disabled that, because he has respect.
OKay it is settled. I quit Minecraft. All of this discussion has shown to me I need to grow up and put away childish things. Nice meeting you all
Blockbreaker is an optional config.
@Dravarden you just GregTech just admit it, not the nerf.
I just gregtech
wut
I think you mean hate, detest, abhor, loathe, abominate, excrate, dislike, despise, hatred, odium or abhorrence (google, yay!)
and well, I can also make a mod that changes everything in redpower (by breaking copyright and shit) but put it optional in the config, so if they sue me, I'd say ''oh, is optional only, not my problem.
lol forgot the word *hate*, will IC2 sue Railcraft author because he make an optional config for steel instead of refined iron? maybe..
nope, because CJ is cool with that, and doesn't cry like a baby when somebody touches ''my precious!'' mod.
Except that that is different. GregTech in no way breaks copyright, I would assume reflection is used (even though reflection is not necessary to remove a recipe), that is completely within legal grounds.
Well we'll see if RP2 author has any time to sue an IC2 add-on author lol..
Why everyone is flaming GT for this optional nerf?
Oh yeah that's because Greg did it.. yeah it's probably true.
@Dravarden if you didn't see the last edit: why do you hate GregTech so much? I heard it's because of bauxite and implosion compressor..
- Status