I'm not actually really sure why people thought my plan to put you on trial was a good one, I suggested it as a joke ;p
Hypothesis - wolves saw an opportunity to stall for time votewise. Hopped on leading to another day without a wolf on the stand. So, we have erin, eru, and Sora who all hopped onto that wagon.
Eru's talked a lot and concluded very little, is a bit trigger happy on the jailing and very pointedly abstained from voting on SE37, opting to vote KC to 'maintain a tie.'
erin/Sora: Both very quiet, but regularly posting - suggests following the game at least. Unsure as to whether through lack of time or lack of desire to be noticed.
There's sufficient basis to argue a trial on any of the three of them, and my gut tells me that at least one is possibly a wolf from the goreae vote spam.
That also leaves:
Me: Super-innocent, but with a less than stellar track record.
goreae: Pretty much townie no. 1 to my mind.
Lenscas: The other half of the dynamic duo, nothing really concerns me here.
And the inactives
016Nojr
sgbros
The_J
If I was going to call any of the inactives as a wolf, I would lean to the J at this point. He seems to post little meaningless bits every now and then, which suggests he's monitoring the game, but not really contributing anything.
Regardless of who we vote up, I think we need to seriously get smarter as to how we vote people up. Why not drag some of the judgement a bit earlier?
@Eruantien
@SoraZodia
@erindalc
Why did you vote for goreae to go on trial? What is your view on the reasoning I have provided above. Anything to say in your defence?
@016Nojr Long time no see buddy. Spwn's mentioned you've been on the forums, care to give us a reason to believe you aren't a silent wolf?
@the_j485 If you could find the time to read through and draw some conclusions rather than null posts, would be a much more useful approach to you monitoring the game. Even if it's just a vote with a brief explanation behind it.