It's already being done and it's called Terasology. It's not Minecraft yet, but...
I have looked at Terasology in the past. It is actually a promising project too. At least further along then my attempt
It's already being done and it's called Terasology. It's not Minecraft yet, but...
Same goes for minetest.It's already being done and it's called Terasology. It's not Minecraft yet, but...
I love this claim. "Businessess are in it only for the profit, so if they do something only for profit, they can't be greedy/evil/immoral!" It's not even circular logic, it's just... no logic at all.Kids gotta realize, a business' sole purpose is profit. Of course they expect a payout. If you think a company is immoral/evil/greedy/customer-unaware for approaching a buyout with hopes of making profit, you're delusional and naive. That doesn't mean they don't care about the consumer's needs or demands (actually quite the opposite).
In all seriousness though, I don't get the random flailing. Nothing has happened to Minecraft. If Microsoft does buy Mojang? Still nothing happened to Minecraft. It's only when Microsoft actually makes a policy change that does affect Minecraft, THEN it's justified to run screaming in circles.
Again, note that buying mojang - rather than minecraft - means that there's plenty of "extra value". Mojang already has two other games on the way, and the deal may include other things as well.The maths of the situation is concerning.
According to articles, Mojang has sold "more than 50 million" Minecraft accounts.
They might, but it seems very much of a gray legal area - if I buy a year card at the local gym, and they after 5 months say "hey, from now on we're going to take 10 bucks per visit even though you have a year card", that's clearly not a valid claim.Eh, its microsoft, they would find some way to worm out of it.
Me too. If they shit all over minecraft, I'll be joining the AAARGGGHHs.NO!!!
I NEED MY MODS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It'd be hard for them to limit playing on pre-microsoft versions. AFAIK there are already ways to bypass the login, so I think we can be safe in that one way or another we will be able to play and mod for up to 1.8 at least.
Yeah, don't get me wrong, this is really bad. But at least we don't have to abandon all hope just yetIt sure would be possible (and in fact it is not even hard) but still would be rather bad that we would have to do something like that and I'm not sure it would work for server play.
Yeah... even if it does happen, I hope it wont be finalised until 2.0It'd be hard for them to limit playing on pre-microsoft versions. AFAIK there are already ways to bypass the login, so I think we can be safe in that one way or another we will be able to play and mod for up to 1.8 at least.
Guys, guys! Calm down! This is all a misunderstanding! Steve Ballmer just wanted to try out playing Minecraft and told his secretary to go "buy Minecraft", and an nearby journalist with an overactive imagination happened to hear the wrong half of that sentence...
In all seriousness though, I don't get the random flailing. Nothing has happened to Minecraft. If Microsoft does buy Mojang? Still nothing happened to Minecraft. It's only when Microsoft actually makes a policy change that does affect Minecraft, THEN it's justified to run screaming in circles.
There's nothing more facepalm-worthy than reading "I am leaving the Minecraft community because I'm imagining a hypothetical scenario in my head!". There's plenty of good reasons to move on to other games, but that is not one of them. Seriously, Minecraft community. Can you discuss anything at all in a mature manner, without devolving into excessive, self-generated drama?
This'll be my one and only comment on this rumor. I'll unwatch this thread and sit back and see how it plays out. See you on the other side of the rumored announcement window...
NOOOOOOOOOOOupdated apparently it a go for the sale
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09...ype=blogs&smid=tw-nytimestech&seid=auto&_r=1&