Should I be concerned that air returns "1" and iron bars returns "1F"? That seems a safe way to prevent death and dismemberment.
Mod Feedback [By Request] RotaryCraft Suggestions
- Thread starter Reika
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Should I be concerned that air returns "1" and iron bars returns "1F"? That seems a safe way to prevent death and dismemberment.
No, the "F" just marks it as a float. Presumably it was originally less than one.
Hmmm... Maybe if you used .nbs files? I feel like that should be easier to work with than .mid files. (btw, .nbs is basically .mid, except it's specifically designed for note blocks)
Fairly sure, as it often occurs immediately after login - I've got something running in a loaded chunk overnight, and I come back to have run out of power.
If you like, I can screenshot the precise setup, if you think it matters.
Attached.
In words - 1-clock to AC engine to shaft to bevel to clutch to:
(inactive) shaft to shaft to coil to safety-shut off
(active) 4:1 to 2:1 to magnetizer
Machine is currently functioning.
(On a side note, the AC engine is stated to work most steadily with a 2-clock, but doubling the frequency to a 1-clock seems to improve results - or did you mean "clock with period 2" and not "clock with duty cycle 2"?)
In words - 1-clock to AC engine to shaft to bevel to clutch to:
(inactive) shaft to shaft to coil to safety-shut off
(active) 4:1 to 2:1 to magnetizer
Machine is currently functioning.
(On a side note, the AC engine is stated to work most steadily with a 2-clock, but doubling the frequency to a 1-clock seems to improve results - or did you mean "clock with period 2" and not "clock with duty cycle 2"?)
Attachments
The setup looks fine, though I question the use of a multiclutch without a redstone connection.
Period 2.
There's a torch buried under the multiclutch, so that it turns off when the industrial coil is 14/15 charged.
This has been asked before - and Thorium fuel exists in ReC - but I do not see anything new that they bring to the gameplay.
Would it be possible to add dense ores support in RoC? There is a pulveriser recipe: 1 dense ore --> 4 ore, so perhaps the grinder could do the same or better.
How does DenseOres work? Does it create dense ores for every ore registered, or only for vanilla ores? Is there OreDict support?
Also, the Extractor/Grinder registries are not built for this.
It automatically creates dense ores for vanilla ores with a config I believe for other registered ores to be added. As for oredict I'm not sure...
You could add thorium as a secondary output for something, perhaps replacing pitchblend in coal, as well as being a very common secondary from pitchblend? Redstone ore could also be a candidate.
It could then either be fissioned on its own as a weak but clean(er) and more common fuel source, or bred into uranium for more power but more waste.
Last edited:
I know you're not keen on duplicating what other mods can do... But I find myself wishing for a RoC way to generate cobble and stone in scaling methods. ;]
Would that be a potential option for the Obsidian Factory?
Would that be a potential option for the Obsidian Factory?
Not really, not because of function duplication but because "Obsidian Factory" and required GUI and item i/o logic rewrites.
On a side note...
I know that 720 MJ is a lot, but it's also about equivalent to 100 kg of TNT.
Here's 5 kg being completely contained by an armored vault - maybe a foot of steel?
Given this, I feel safe saying that the base-destroying four-meters-of-solid-stone explosion of the Industrial Coil is probably a tad... excessive. Maybe consider toning it down a bit?
I know that 720 MJ is a lot, but it's also about equivalent to 100 kg of TNT.
Here's 5 kg being completely contained by an armored vault - maybe a foot of steel?
Given this, I feel safe saying that the base-destroying four-meters-of-solid-stone explosion of the Industrial Coil is probably a tad... excessive. Maybe consider toning it down a bit?
The explosion is actually calculated realistically. A test with a precision made steel sphere, precisely designed for the purposes of containing explosions, is not a useful comparison.