Guesses...
Go into Options, make sure you have enough ram allocated.
Make sure you are downloading 1.07
Hit 'Force Update' or chuck the files and do a clean download.
Blood N Bones [Hardcore Survival]
- Thread starter Eyamaz
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Go into Options, make sure you have enough ram allocated.
Make sure you are downloading 1.07
Hit 'Force Update' or chuck the files and do a clean download.
You are already playing with this in the dev builds.
Logs.
You need to copy the /libs folder from a working 1.5 instance (like unleashed) into the 1.5 BnB instance.
Hmm i don't really understand that.. I'm quite new to the FTB launcher so i would appreciate it if you could give a more detailed explanation?
what's up with the metallurgy ore gen? The only Overworld metallurgy ore I found is zinc. No carmot. No infucosium. No others. Nor can I find any vulcanite or sanginite in the nether, 30 minutes of creative mode flying suggests that there is none. Any help? or do I have to cheat some in?
Hmm i don't really understand that.. I'm quite new to the FTB launcher so i would appreciate it if you could give a more detailed explanation?
Perhaps playing the 1.6.4 version would be easier as you only need to select it in the mod pack window of the launcher and press launch.
THANKYOU! I couldn't find any info on this anywhere in the metallurgy config. didn't think to check other world gen of other mods :/
Actually in the Metallurgy config. Carmot for example is in the Fantasy config and the Diminsions=-100 option says to place it in the Deep Dark. Deep Dark = -100, Overworld = 0, Nether = -1, End = 1
Also it is spelled wrong and actually should be dimensions, but having good grammar and spelling are not a requirement for making awesome mods
I still cant seem to find any Vulcanite or sanginite any idea for that?Actually in the Metallurgy config. Carmot for example is in the Fantasy config and the Diminsions=-100 option says to place it in the Deep Dark. Deep Dark = -100, Overworld = 0, Nether = -1, End = 1
Also it is spelled wrong and actually should be dimensions, but having good grammar and spelling are not a requirement for making awesome mods
Those 2 are in the Nether according to the config. Looks pretty rare compared to the other ores in the Nether based on the gen values.
Vulcanite and sanguinite are rare. Sanguinite also has a tendency to look just like nether redstone.
I just started looking for vulcanite/sanguinite myself and I know how much trouble Batch2 was having finding it so I checked the configs. In 1.0.7, it should generate 2 veins per chunk and each vein should have about 3 ore. The problem is the min and max Y are 0 and 128. So you're looking for 6 blocks (12 if you count both vulc/sang) somewhere between bedrock at 0 and bedrock at 128 in each 16x16 chunk. Ouch.
And just for fun, if you're in a chunk that's solid all the way from top to bottom, that's 12 blocks of interest out of 16x16x128 = 32,768 blocks. Of course, most chunks will have air and/or lava in the middle forcing the ore above or below. Hmmm... maybe digging under or way above lava lakes would be a way to find some?
I know Eyamaz is working on updating the ore gen in the next update, but yeah... finding it is going to be _really_ tough right now.
vulcanite has a particle effect at least, while sanguinite is camoflaged. If your brave, (or server is slow) and you can run through the surface areas, you can get lucky with the vulcanite.
Does it do that? I always interpreted those numbers as representative of a statistically average... i.e. generate such that there will be an average of 2 viens per chunk not place 2 veins in every chunk.
I'm fairly sure it's how many times it attempts to place an ore per chunk(I'm basing this on a forge ore gen tutorial), but of course it could fail or be replaced by other mods ores.
That would make sense. It would still matter what it actually does when placing. Bit at least it tells us that the number only represents a maximum.
Probably something simple like: for number of veins generate a random location in chunk. If blocks at this location are netherrack/etc.. replace with ore.
I could be wrong, but I thought that
I:"Vein Chance"=100 meant 100% chance per chunk, and
I:"Vein Density"=100 meant 100% of the vein size is used each time.
I suppose there might be some documentation on it somewhere...
[Edit: Yeah, that's wrong. See below]
I:"Vein Density"=100 meant 100% of the vein size is used each time.
I suppose there might be some documentation on it somewhere...
[Edit: Yeah, that's wrong. See below]
Last edited:
Her: So what did you do for lunch today?
Me: Oh, I analyzed a bunch of Nether chunks to find fantasy metal...
Her: Uhmmm... ok... ?
At any rate, I didn't find any documentation on it, so I went back to MCEdit for answers. I'm sorry to say that it's much worse than I had previously thought.
Short answer: There appear to be about 0.5 sanguinite / 0.5 vulcanite per chunk. There is less ore where there is more air/lava, presumably because it can't populate the ore in air/lava blocks, so digging under/above lava lakes won't really help. There will be less to dig because of the air/lava, but there will be less ore to find too. Good luck in the current version.
More details and math and stuff:
Me: Oh, I analyzed a bunch of Nether chunks to find fantasy metal...
Her: Uhmmm... ok... ?
At any rate, I didn't find any documentation on it, so I went back to MCEdit for answers. I'm sorry to say that it's much worse than I had previously thought.
Short answer: There appear to be about 0.5 sanguinite / 0.5 vulcanite per chunk. There is less ore where there is more air/lava, presumably because it can't populate the ore in air/lava blocks, so digging under/above lava lakes won't really help. There will be less to dig because of the air/lava, but there will be less ore to find too. Good luck in the current version.
More details and math and stuff:
First test with BoP enabled. new 1.0.7 creative world. Flew around Nether and generated 4392 total chunks.
2741 total Vulcanite (ID 909:8).
2741/4392 = 0.62 vulcanite per chunk
32x32x128 selection (4 chunks): 0 vulcanite
Second Test without BoP: Teleported around to various locations (+/- 100, 300, and 500) and generated 8099 chunks (in much less time)
3842 total Sanguinitie (909:7)
3650 total Vulcanite (909:8)
3842/8099 = 0.47 sang per chunk
3650/8099 = 0.45 vulc per chunk
All chunks between Y= 0 to 64:
1911 sang = 49% total
1880 vulc = 51% total
64x64 selection (16 chunks) mostly over lava lake:
Total: sang 4, vulc 12
Under lava level (37H): sang 2, vulc 5
Ceiling (37H): sang 2, vulc 7
64x64 (16 chunks) mostly solid:
Total: sang 15, vulc 21
Under laval level (37H): sang 1, vulc 9
Ceiling (37H): sang 8, vulc 5
The selections for trying to determine if there is less ore per chunk when there is more air/lava (over a lava lake) should really be bigger to be sure the numbers are accurate, but it's hard to find a large number of chunks all over lava or all not over lava. I think it's enough to show that there is indeed less ore in chunks with more air/lava. Looks to be somewhere around 25-50% less with a pretty big margin of error.
2741 total Vulcanite (ID 909:8).
2741/4392 = 0.62 vulcanite per chunk
32x32x128 selection (4 chunks): 0 vulcanite
Second Test without BoP: Teleported around to various locations (+/- 100, 300, and 500) and generated 8099 chunks (in much less time)
3842 total Sanguinitie (909:7)
3650 total Vulcanite (909:8)
3842/8099 = 0.47 sang per chunk
3650/8099 = 0.45 vulc per chunk
All chunks between Y= 0 to 64:
1911 sang = 49% total
1880 vulc = 51% total
64x64 selection (16 chunks) mostly over lava lake:
Total: sang 4, vulc 12
Under lava level (37H): sang 2, vulc 5
Ceiling (37H): sang 2, vulc 7
64x64 (16 chunks) mostly solid:
Total: sang 15, vulc 21
Under laval level (37H): sang 1, vulc 9
Ceiling (37H): sang 8, vulc 5
The selections for trying to determine if there is less ore per chunk when there is more air/lava (over a lava lake) should really be bigger to be sure the numbers are accurate, but it's hard to find a large number of chunks all over lava or all not over lava. I think it's enough to show that there is indeed less ore in chunks with more air/lava. Looks to be somewhere around 25-50% less with a pretty big margin of error.