Do you have proof/source for this? Your going to get this thread closed with all your spam.
You must be new around here if you think going off-topic is going to get a thread closed. I'm sorry if the truth isn't the answer you are wanting to hear, but none of your points have any factual basis. That does not, however, constitute spam, however inconvenient to your world-view it might be.
You know, there used to be this thing called 'the scientific method', which I'd really like to introduce here to prove my point.
First you come up with an idea, then you test the idea until you have a hypothesis, then you test your hypothesis until you have a theory. Then you release the theory to the public, along with the experiments which support your data, and dare the rest of the community to break it. This is known as 'peer review'. Finally, after the theory has been vetted by peer review, and it appears that it is true, it is then considered to be a law.
So, let's set up a little experiment here.
First, we will need to set the conditions. For example, you will need the exact same world for both tests, otherwise you can have environmental influence. I'd suggest a flat world with structures turned off and peaceful mode.
Set up fifty Heat Dynamos with Aqueous Accumulators and Conduit to feed an empty Energy Cell. Measure lag.
Set up one Generator with some copper cable to a Battery Box. Measure lag.
Which one comes out ahead? See for yourself.