Werewolf - Villagers vs. Zombies - Game thread

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Took me a second to find this.

Pyure said:
In my experience, locking a vote is usually a good guy strategy. It shows conviction and, to be honest, a lack of strategy.
Bad guys need to be more flexible and adjust their voting to suit such. They need to be able to change their voting at the last second (to look like they're part of the mob usually)
Click to expand...

From http://forum.feed-the-beast.com/threads/werewolf-unfair-wolf-game-thread.52856/page-28#post-797853

I have, shall we say, very good reasons for my lock. Bye bye fraction2.
 
  • Like
Reactions: buggirlexpres
And I would expect someone like you (who posted that for everyone to see) would know that.
Locking your vote this early is silly, especially for someone like you who knows what they're doing.

You know that locking makes you look like a villager, so you do. If you remember, you posted the wolf conversation back in trajing's last game. You told goreae that the locked vote was brilliant, because it was a move that made him strongly resemble a villager.

Anybody else that wants to see this can: here
 
Fraction2 said:
And I would expect someone like you (who posted that for everyone to see) would know that.
You know that locking makes you look like a villager, so you do. If you remember, you posted the wolf conversation back in trajing's last game. You told goreae that the locked vote was brilliant, because it was a move that made him strongly resemble a villager.

Anybody else that wants to see this can: here
Click to expand...

I'd forgotten that conversation completely. I was worried that I contradicted this theory at some point, but that really reinforces it instead. Thanks :)

Also: I don't buy into WIFOM arguments. Yes, I think locking is a strong villager move. Period.
 
Pyure said:
I don't buy into WIFOM arguments.
Click to expand...

WIFOM arguments (how people act) are pretty much all we have to use in Werewolf. We can't cite any hard forensic evidence, because we physically can't accomplish that.

We HAVE to determine votes based on how people act.
 
Fraction2 said:
WIFOM arguments (how people act) are pretty much all we have to use in Werewolf. We can't cite any hard forensic evidence, because we physically can't accomplish that.

We HAVE to determine votes based on how people act.
Click to expand...
That's different than wifom arguments. Trying to guess how many times a person's predictability is going to cancel out is stupid. Make your best guess and go with it.

In this case, I have a list of characteristics which are "wolfy" and "villagery", and I don't have anything like "but this person is so smart that he'll manipulate my data." I'd have to throw my whole system out the window.
 
The Librarian role as it is now seems fairly useless. What if I change it so that he will instead recieve two names, one of which is the convert?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom