no.... just continue with your flawed voting *catface*Any problem with that?
no.... just continue with your flawed voting *catface*Any problem with that?
Pyure is still teaching me how to play.
Can you proof that?Mmkey... If you keep it like that you'll lose an important role.
Can someone post the order of events please?
You're the blacksmith?Well i don't trust anyone... Will you waste an easy zombie kill for a dumb lynching? If i don't get lynched vike will get killed. I don't trust him. If i make a mistake with that, so be it.
My preference: if we (as GMs) botch a role design, we remember and fix it the next game. At worst, the role is a "basic villager" and there's nothing wrong with that. I wouldn't change anything midgame for certain.The Librarian role as it is now seems fairly useless. What if I change it so that he will instead recieve two names, one of which is the convert?
I misunderstood you too. I see now that you were trying to say "I'm voting Nojr so that I'm not voting someone who looks innocent"You got me wrong there btw. I had a vote on fraction2 at the start of the day. The reason is that i'm not voting fraction2 anymore.
Up to the GM, but traditionally, everyone who has a vote on them gets their name thrown into a hat and a single name comes out. That means everyone with a single vote on them or more has an equal chance of being lynched (*not* a weighted chance)@ljfa what happens if there is a draw with votes??