WEREWOLF UNRELATED THREAD

[SpwnX]

Think of the present or at least the close future within your lifetime or your descendants. That alone should be worthwhile. Unless you're a person that cares for nothing at all, not even yourself.

We're not here to change the universe, we're just living and that won't change. At least be glad you might be able to fill your biological role. or not. heh. heh. heh...

 

[Pyure]

1. If the afterlife is not static it can end. Thus it will either end (and nothing else happens) or mean nothing because it is static
2. See 1

Curiously four-dimensional view of things. Your perception of the universe is built purely on the basis of a three-plane existence moving through time. We are born, we grow, we die, and that's it. From a wider perspective, this whole process could be "happening" over and over again, universes built and snuffed out constantly. It may mean nothing to us because we're small and limited, but similarly: quantum physics mean little to ants.

 

[Strikingwolf]

Think of the present or at least the close future within your lifetime or your descendants. That alone should be worthwhile. Unless you're a person that cares for nothing at all, not even yourself.

I don't know of I do or don't

Curiously four-dimensional view of things. Your perception of the universe is built purely on the basis of a three-plane existence moving through time. We are born, we grow, we die, and that's it. From a wider perspective, this whole process could be "happening" over and over again, universes built and snuffed out constantly. It may mean nothing to us because we're small and limited, but similarly quantum physics mean little to ants.

If it is happening over and over than what is the point of it?

What is the reason for this existance

 

[Pyure]

I don't know of I do or don't

If it is happening over and over than what is the point of it?

What is the reason for this existance

Why do you figure it could be expressed in terms we could understand?

 

[Strikingwolf]

Why do you figure it could be expressed in terms we could understand?

It probably can't. thus why should I care about the end result?

 

[dylanpiera]

why are we even discussing things

So what do you guys think about the new game
Evolve?

 

[SpwnX]

We're discussing very important matters like the reason of our existance, how can you not notice the importance of it?

Also, we're not here to declare whether its worth or not living. Its up to each of us to decide if it is or not.
I have decided that it is, despite the bad things that may have already happened on my past. I work to build a better future for myself and my beloved ones.

 

[dylanpiera]

bla bla bla.

Because i hate thinking about that kinda things

And my habbit to read Every post is not usefull in that

 

[SpwnX]

Then just don't and ignore it?
Nobody is forcing you to think about flying pigs or any other utter nonsense.

 

[xTordX]

POTATO!!!
Unrelated enough?

 

[dylanpiera]

POTATO!!!
Unrelated enough?

Better then the sad talk about live and dead and universe and more dead and things and depression and more like that
Or like spam

 

[SpwnX]

I like french fries with a cheeseburger, its something that brings me a bit of joy in my "dull" life.

Not really that unrelated :3

 

[xTordX]

Here! @SpwnX

 

[HeilMewTwo]

What the f*** has been going on here?

 

[xTordX]

Idunno i just got in.

 

[ljfa]

Having this thread was a good idea. Much less crap to wade through in the game thread.

 

[Strikingwolf]

Anyway, I made a gcf function in Clojure \o/

 

[ljfa]

Anyway, I made a gcf function in Clojure \o/

gcf ?

 

[Strikingwolf]

gcf ?

Greatest Common Factor.

The hardest part was making a common (in some lists) function

(defn common
  "Finds the things in common between lists"
  ([lst1 lst2]
    (loop [result '() combined (sort (concat lst1 lst2))]
      (if (empty? combined)
        (sort result)
        (if (= (first combined) (second combined))
          (recur (cons (first combined) result) (rest (rest combined)))
          (recur result (rest combined))))))
  ([lst1 lst2 & lsts]
    (->> (common lst1 lst2) (common (reduce common lsts)))))

 

[Strikingwolf]

Greatest Common Factor.

The hardest part was making a common (in some lists) function

(defn common
  "Finds the things in common between lists"
  ([lst1 lst2]
    (loop [result '() combined (sort (concat lst1 lst2))]
      (if (empty? combined)
        (sort result)
        (if (= (first combined) (second combined))
          (recur (cons (first combined) result) (rest (rest combined)))
          (recur result (rest combined))))))
  ([lst1 lst2 & lsts]
    (->> (common lst1 lst2) (common (reduce common lsts)))))

Here is the rest of the code BTW You will have to follow all my function definitions