Public announcement.
\o/Other news; I'm officially a note-taking villager.
Public announcement.
\o/Other news; I'm officially a note-taking villager.
Now you just need to become a logical villager!Other news; I'm officially a note-taking villager.
The intent was to wait until a moderate amount of people were left, and then join back in, as that would make it more likely for me to survive until the end. Of course, when I finally chose to use it, the village killed the last wolf.I would like to suggest a rule.
Anybody who gets smited on the first day cannot participate in the next game.
I know that this sounds severe, and I think there will be some exceptions, like if they play later on, but if somebody signs up for a game, and does not play it, then they should have some sort of repercussion. It is really annoying to have people sign up, and never play.
For example, trajing did this during my game, where, although he was lynched the first day, he had a free revival ability. However, he did not use it the entire game, thus signifying to me that he did not come back to the game. This really throws off games, especially when the person has an important role, like wolf.
That is tough, and I can't say I disagree at all with your reasoning. But whose gonna be the guy to say no when someone says "im sowwy, pwetty pweeze"?I would like to suggest a rule.
Anybody who gets smited on the first day cannot participate in the next game.
I know that this sounds severe, and I think there will be some exceptions, like if they play later on, but if somebody signs up for a game, and does not play it, then they should have some sort of repercussion. It is really annoying to have people sign up, and never play.
For example, trajing did this during my game, where, although he was lynched the first day, he had a free revival ability. However, he did not use it the entire game, thus signifying to me that he did not come back to the game. This really throws off games, especially when the person has an important role, like wolf.
Without condemning or condoning Bachman's rule, I'd like to point out that your solution contradicts itself.That is tough, and I can't say I disagree at all with your reasoning. But whose gonna be the guy to say no when someone says "im sowwy, pwetty pweeze"?
Rather than a rule I think its sufficient to rely on common sense. If someone demonstrates a pattern of screwing with games, I won't let them into mine and I can't expect anyone else would want to either.
But whose gonna be the guy to say no when someone says "im sowwy, pwetty pweeze"?
Shaz and Pyure are confirmed the same person.But whose gonna be the guy to say no when someone says "im sowwy, pwetty pweeze"?
But that is my entire game plan!Rather than a rule I think its sufficient to rely on common sense. If someone demonstrates a pattern of screwing with games, I won't let them into mine and I can't expect anyone else would want to either.
On the contrary, its my game. If Dinkatron4000 joins two of my games and makes a total ass of himself I reserve the right to keep him out (or summarily smite his ass on D1 to make a point). But if there's a rule that says X strikes and you're out, and I'm convinced that it was a total freak accident, the "rules" prevent me from compassionately letting him back in.Without condemning or condoning Bachman's rule, I'd like to point out that your solution contradicts itself.
You want the individual GMs, with no "official" rule or reason to point to, to deny someone access to their game. But whose gonna be the guy to say no when someone says "im sowwy, pwetty pweeze"?
PS: I personally recommend against letting Dinkatron4000 into your games.
Took the words right out of my mouth.Shazam's totally using me as an alt from now on, by the way.
Shhh. I'm totally real.Wait what? I'm not sure if this is real or fake or what...
Sure thing, Frac! Hang o- Wait a minute.Shazam, can I get that alt to? The first three were killed in a drive-by
HmmmmShhh. I'm totally real.
HMMMMMMSure thing, Frac! Hang o- Wait a minute.
He's on to us, Shazam.Hmmmm