Sorry, that was unclear. Right now you're letting the Wolverine infect someone every night, but balancing it by killing him if he infects another wolf (which means removing the wolf convo). If you limit how often the Wolverine can infect people, you don't need to kill the wolf convo to make the role balanced(ish).
Have it so that the wolverine can only infect people he responds to or quotes in the game thread, that way villagers have some evidence to go on?
There's a way around this--force player networks to form via random results. No more than three people in a convo, and only once per player. This creates a "we may be wolves already" situation that encourages people to find out which group is screwed or not. I like this mechanic to get people to network where they normally don't, like my SpyWolf 2 game with Masterminds.
So this mechanic + my earlier one, or would wolverine only be able to infect those in their random group?
Both. You get an immediate pool of wolflings to build on with N1 and N2, while rampant speculation occurs in the main thread. Of course, you may branch out and start your own cells of loyalists directing everyone instead. Big opportunities for strategy this way.
What? If your saying I made a game, no, it's just a random template that I for some reason crated.
You did not yet allow other people to view the document. By default every google doc document is only accessible for you (unless they are stored in a folder which is shared)
