Werewolf - Law of the Land- signup thread

[ljfa]

This is gonna be a complicated game, I think I'll join the fun ^^

 

[playerismc]

In

 

[dylanpiera]

Well Ljfa if you vote me for sherrif this game won't be that complicated

 

[Eruantien]

"sherrrifff"

arr

 

[SoraZodia]

In

 

[016Nojr]

In, not pinged tho

 

[Fraction2]

Well Ljfa if you vote me for sherrif this game won't be that complicated

That's a reason not to vote for dylanpiera.

Voting for Fraction will get you rules like "every post must be a haiku" or "no proper nouns may be used" or "you can only vote for players with less than three vowels in their name"

 

[Gamefury64]

.sdrawkcab eb tsum stsop llA
:waL tsriF

:Noitalsnart

First law:
All posts must be backwards

 

[trajing]

.sdrawkcab eb tsum stsop llA
:waL tsriF

:Noitalsnart

First law:
All posts must be backwards

U+202e

 

[Shazam08]

Hm...

Given that both the rule-maker and role-maker are villager roles, couldn't this become very one-sided?

 

[Lethosos]

Not really. Wolf is also a role.

Sent from my SGH-T769 using Tapatalk 2

 

[016Nojr]

Current players:

1. trajing

Wow, lonely...

 

[Lethosos]

Perfect!

Sent from my SGH-T769 using Tapatalk 2

 

[goreae]

In! There was a question a while back about whether this game might be simple and boring or absolutely and completely insane. My guess is the latter.

Also, question, do the D1 votes have to be all different, or could players vote for the same thing three times?

The top three actions that day will be accepted. You can vote three times, either on the same thing or all on one thing.

So, just checking, I can't switch action votes or am I misinterpreting this?

you can switch action votes all you want, unless you lock because of course there's a lock.

Well, there's a skull with a dagger stuck in one of the eyeholes at the top of the list...

BTW, I'll give it a try. Is there an option to nullify a rule if it conflicts with another? Or at least to close any perceived loopholes?

Sent from my SGH-T769 using Tapatalk 2

rule interactions will be dealt with as they come up. Rules can be edited with other rules.

In!


This confuses me. Are you saying "This won't work, because the wolves don't know who they themselves are." or "You (the player) can't punish someone for not following this rule, because you don't know who they are."?

You as a town deal with punishments and rules. If as a town you pass a rle that says "all wolves must reveal themselves." then how do you punish the wolves that break that rule if you don't know who the wolves are?

Hm...

Given that both the rule-maker and role-maker are villager roles, couldn't this become very one-sided?

Wolven is a character trait. That means you can have a wolven sherrif or a wolven seer. So you can elect a wolf as a sherrif or mayor. You simply do not know.

I'll get around to adding everyone to the players list now.

 

[goreae]

oh, and sheriff/mayor votes do not count as actions. Those are an entirely separate event.

 

[Eruantien]

... is @trajing not playing anymore? You've removed him from the list...

 

[goreae]

... is @trajing not playing anymore? You've removed him from the list...

I had a lot of issues with the numbering thing

 

[dylanpiera]

That's a reason not to vote for dylanpiera.

Voting for Fraction will get you rules like "every post must be a haiku" or "no proper nouns may be used" or "you can only vote for players with less than three vowels in their name"

Well with my rules the game will be over after a night

 

[Fraction2]

Well with my rules the game will be over after a night

How?

 

[dylanpiera]

Rule: Everyone wins.
Done

There is no rule saying i can't