Have a see at his role and tell me what it is. This is assuming the bodyguard trusts you enough, sadly I do not.
Anyone could work that out.
Werewolf Game 2 Game Thread
- Thread starter ICountFrom0
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Have a see at his role and tell me what it is. This is assuming the bodyguard trusts you enough, sadly I do not.
Anyone could work that out.
I redact my vote from Vikestep.[DOUBLEPOST=1377724291][/DOUBLEPOST]Bodyguard, please protect him, it is urgent that you do so.[DOUBLEPOST=1377724497][/DOUBLEPOST]I now vote for the next person on my list to lynch, I vote to lynch Henry Link.
Are you sure is not a fool?[DOUBLEPOST=1377725172][/DOUBLEPOST]Since everyone is doing it, I VOTE TO LYNCH HENRY LINK
I'm not quite sold that VikeStep's the "Fortune Teller".
Choosing Staxed was a strange call. You were very suspicious of me, and apparently planned to lynch me right out the gates today. So why didn't you target me, the player you were planning on lynching, to make sure you weren't about to lynch a villager? Or Peggle? Why didn't you target oh-so-suspicious Peggle? Doesn't add up.
On the other hand, if someone wanted to fake being the Seer, they'd have to claim they checked a player whose role they already knew, or risk being caught in a lie. Staxed is the only player who confirmed his role yesterday (when he confirmed that villagers weren't called civilians---something only a person holding a "VILLAGER" card could have done). Going into last night, no one's role was as clear as Staxed... and yet Staxed is the player you supposedly targeted, instead of the players you were actually suspicious of.
That's ... suspicious. And your evidence is a far cry from proof---none of us know the roles in this game. You could have invented that role out of whole cloth, and none of us would be the wiser. We don't even know if there's a Seer in the game.
VikeStep, if you really are the Fortune Teller, I hope you see the logic in the above, and understand why I'm not quite ready to believe you. And then I hope you'll respond with an explanation for why you chose Staxed---one that's better than "he's the only person whose role I already knew, so it was the only way I could fake being the Seer".[DOUBLEPOST=1377725805][/DOUBLEPOST]And the reason VikeStep would know my role is because I told it to Staxed (since he confirmed he was a villager), and Staxed told it to VikeStep when VikeStep told Staxed "I'm the Fortune Teller, and I just cleared you".
Choosing Staxed was a strange call. You were very suspicious of me, and apparently planned to lynch me right out the gates today. So why didn't you target me, the player you were planning on lynching, to make sure you weren't about to lynch a villager? Or Peggle? Why didn't you target oh-so-suspicious Peggle? Doesn't add up.
On the other hand, if someone wanted to fake being the Seer, they'd have to claim they checked a player whose role they already knew, or risk being caught in a lie. Staxed is the only player who confirmed his role yesterday (when he confirmed that villagers weren't called civilians---something only a person holding a "VILLAGER" card could have done). Going into last night, no one's role was as clear as Staxed... and yet Staxed is the player you supposedly targeted, instead of the players you were actually suspicious of.
That's ... suspicious. And your evidence is a far cry from proof---none of us know the roles in this game. You could have invented that role out of whole cloth, and none of us would be the wiser. We don't even know if there's a Seer in the game.
VikeStep, if you really are the Fortune Teller, I hope you see the logic in the above, and understand why I'm not quite ready to believe you. And then I hope you'll respond with an explanation for why you chose Staxed---one that's better than "he's the only person whose role I already knew, so it was the only way I could fake being the Seer".[DOUBLEPOST=1377725805][/DOUBLEPOST]And the reason VikeStep would know my role is because I told it to Staxed (since he confirmed he was a villager), and Staxed told it to VikeStep when VikeStep told Staxed "I'm the Fortune Teller, and I just cleared you".
... and HERE we have a convenient defense against being caught in a lie by the real Seer: "Oh, there might be two; maybe we're both Seers (and maybe we both have different names)."
Staxed, I'm concerned. I'm really concerned. This isn't adding up.
Belay that order! After assessing evidence I have recently received, I can confirm:
VikeStep IS the Fortune Teller.
(But damn, those pieces really did paint the perfect picture of a brilliantly evil ploy---they really did all fall into place, I thought you were this supremely brilliant mastermind who'd played everyone. I love this game.)
Bodyguard, protect VikeStep. And if there's a role-switcher in this game (you know who you are), please swap me for someone wolf-like, because I suspect I'm the wolves' second priority and it would be oh-so-nice for them to kill one of their own.
Vote to lynch Staxed.
Hah! Scared ya, didn't I! I believe this is the only way to formally "redact" my vote against VikeStep, and I'm not quite ready to hop on the Henry Link bandwagon. But, just in case you can redact a vote:
I redact my vote to lynch Staxed.
Now: Why the crusade against Henry Link? I mean, I don't like to lynch people blindly, I'm not a sociopath
VikeStep IS the Fortune Teller.
(But damn, those pieces really did paint the perfect picture of a brilliantly evil ploy---they really did all fall into place, I thought you were this supremely brilliant mastermind who'd played everyone. I love this game.)
Bodyguard, protect VikeStep. And if there's a role-switcher in this game (you know who you are), please swap me for someone wolf-like, because I suspect I'm the wolves' second priority and it would be oh-so-nice for them to kill one of their own.
Vote to lynch Staxed.
Hah! Scared ya, didn't I! I believe this is the only way to formally "redact" my vote against VikeStep, and I'm not quite ready to hop on the Henry Link bandwagon. But, just in case you can redact a vote:
I redact my vote to lynch Staxed.
Now: Why the crusade against Henry Link? I mean, I don't like to lynch people blindly, I'm not a sociopath
At this point I still don't know what is going on. However, at the moment I'll trust Staxed and Vike. So, I will change my vote. I vote for droideka. I hope this is the right decision.
I am the bartender on the villager team. Basically that means I get to stuff the ballot box with an extra vote.[DOUBLEPOST=1377728088][/DOUBLEPOST]But to be honest if it is me or the seer (currently I believe that to be Vike). Go ahead and lynch so the seer can hopefully live another night.
Okay! Listen up, townsfolk and werepeople, here is a summary of Operation Vote-Split (no, I'm not very creative at all, am I):
Henry Link claims to be a villager who gets to stuff the ballot box with an extra vote. We can test him on this by forcing a tie in the visible votes (there are ten of us, so it's doable). If the result is a tie, then we know he's lying about his role. If our tie-vote doesn't tie, then we know he's telling the truth about his secret vote-stuffing ability, and we'll have cleared a player as a villager instead of lynching one. Everyone's happy. Well, except Droideka.
After I vote to lynch Droideka30, the current tally stands at:
Henry Link: 4 --- VikeStep, dgdas9, the_j485 (plus a presumable vote from Droideka30)
Droideka30: 3 --- Staxed, Eunomiac, Henry Link
Three players have yet to vote: goreae, Jess887cp, and GPuzzle. If one of you votes for Droideka30, we'll have our tie. The other two can vote for whoever, or split their votes between Henry Link and Droideka30. And anyone else can check back at midnight to make sure everything's going according to plan.
There's a good chance we're lynching a villager today, people: We haven't much to go on. But if Operation Vote-Split succeeds, we'll at least gain valuable intel in the process.
Henry Link claims to be a villager who gets to stuff the ballot box with an extra vote. We can test him on this by forcing a tie in the visible votes (there are ten of us, so it's doable). If the result is a tie, then we know he's lying about his role. If our tie-vote doesn't tie, then we know he's telling the truth about his secret vote-stuffing ability, and we'll have cleared a player as a villager instead of lynching one. Everyone's happy. Well, except Droideka.
After I vote to lynch Droideka30, the current tally stands at:
Henry Link: 4 --- VikeStep, dgdas9, the_j485 (plus a presumable vote from Droideka30)
Droideka30: 3 --- Staxed, Eunomiac, Henry Link
Three players have yet to vote: goreae, Jess887cp, and GPuzzle. If one of you votes for Droideka30, we'll have our tie. The other two can vote for whoever, or split their votes between Henry Link and Droideka30. And anyone else can check back at midnight to make sure everything's going according to plan.
There's a good chance we're lynching a villager today, people: We haven't much to go on. But if Operation Vote-Split succeeds, we'll at least gain valuable intel in the process.