Oh i got a new one. Augments for RA stuff. Like adding enhancements on armor and make it visible.
Mod Feedback Thermal Series Design/Feedback
- Thread starter King Lemming
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
For what reason? The way we do recipes you literally don't improve your load time, performance, or anything at all actually. We don't have a million recipes - we have one extremely intelligent recipe. If you're worried about recipe bloat, you removed exactly the one mod on the list that doesn't cause it. We also have connected textures.
If it's just an OCD thing, then I can't really help you there. There is no good way to do a truly universal system, because it has to interface with the underlying tiles and they're responsible for the behavior and the rendering. Is it possible to do an interface? Maybe, but it becomes something everyone implements on their tiles and does their own way. It could assist with a bit of crossover stuff, but it wouldn't be truly universal.
Didn't realize it still had that dependency. That's unfortunate.
Maybe in Thermal Ascension. I sort of consider those things to be broken by design and wouldn't put it in TE proper.
We don't have anything to do with Redstone Armory. As far as changing the color on the armor, it's tricky. We'd have to greyscale it to allow that, and it will lose some of the details in the process. It may be feasible, however.
Currently, RSA doesn't have a direct dependency on TE, but that would sort of change that. I've had some ideas for augmentable armor (since TE2 really, before modular powersuits was released), so it's worth looking into definitely.
It also has this warning:
Don't use this in productive environments
WARNING: This is a early version of LP v0.9. It does contain bugs and cause crashes. So be sure to make backups because of possible trouble.
I dunno, that's the warning on the Jenkins page I found for 0.9. If the mod dev suggests I don't use it, I generally listen.
Also, I found nothing in the changelog that indicates that it has moved away from BC dependency. If so, this is great, but I can't find any documentation to confirm this.
Guys i got a question. An easy one. Does lp pipes connect to itemducts? I dont think so but just curious.
The entire point of LP 0.9 at its conception was to make the new pipe models and a unique, non-BC identity - even LP 0.8 doesn't have any big dependencies on BC.
That may well be, but I still cannot find anything citing this in the changelog or any other official documentation.
Perhaps they didn't finish it yet; however I inspected the codebase and the direction it's going in, and that is the plan. (Right now, they still seem to depend on BC - Core, Transport and Silicon specifically; with BC 7, you will be able to include just those again)
The problem with this being that I have no interest in installing Buildcraft
Check out the Unity textures that we have been working on
https://github.com/CyanideX/Unity/pull/19
https://github.com/CyanideX/Unity/pull/8
https://github.com/CyanideX/Unity/pull/5
We are ever getting closer to a full release, but you can download the repo as a zip and convert it yourself easily.
Any plans on adding Agricraft? Having a resource pack that includes Agricraft makes things MUCH easier for making custom plants because you have to make the textures as well and you've got to make sure they are in the correct folder.
Offtopic, but while I don't use a 16x texture pack, I must say, I actually prefer the original textures for storage blocks and ingots over the Unity ones. The Unity ones are very drab/dull, especially the storage blocks. The original textures are much more interesting and feel much more like a solid lump of metal.
They re good but color scheme is not my type i guess. I'll with faithful for now