One that you aren't in. It's my TC Addon idea convo.? what convo???
One that you aren't in. It's my TC Addon idea convo.? what convo???
wat. a convo im not in? ASSIMILATE!One that you aren't in. It's my TC Addon idea convo.
Resistance is futile.wat. a convo im not in? ASSIMILATE!
..star trek ensues!
..and now Madagascar!
...Might I take a peek?One that you aren't in. It's my TC Addon idea convo.
https://twitter.com/Vazkii/status/503609152816832512Thaumcraft 4.2 has bath salts. That's too far for me.
I truthfully LOL'd. I will send you cookies now.
Leave it up to Vazkii...
Part of the problem is that there are now going to be two versions that people feature compare and confuse for bug reporting. Once Forestry under player and coverts care (and whoever else) gets a new feature, everyone will be breathing down the neck of the rf version's dev for it to have it etc.Well, the RForestry is an off-shoot now from what I read. So I'm guessing the main Forestry is still under someone else's care?
If so, people whom prefer MJ can stick with the main Forestry while people whom prefer RF can go with RForestry. So, what are the arguements about?
i fourth the meh.Part of the problem is that there are now going to be two versions that people feature compare and confuse for bug reporting. Once Forestry under player and coverts care (and whoever else) gets a new feature, everyone will be breathing down the neck of the rf version's dev for it to have it etc.
I basically third the "meh" sentiment - same with the rf quarry.