Making your own pack
- Thread starter Tornado3019
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
No, I respawn with nothing like normal, and when I go to my death spot only my baubles items are on the ground
Advanced machines, applied energistics 2, aroma core, asielib, BoP, blood magic, botania, buildcraft, carpenters blocks, chisel, code chicken core, compact windmills, electromagic tools, electromagnetic coherence, enderio, industrialcraft, inventory tweaks, iron chests, JABBA, mantle, m-ores, mouse tweaks, mystcraft, NEI, open eye, railcraft, TiCon, thaumcraft, twilight forest, voxelminimap, wailaCan you provide a list of all the mods in your modpack?
It is most likely one of those.
Mabye back up your world and try disabling each one.
In 1.6 use Crafting manager to alter the recipes.Worked on all my mods, and not just on a few.
The only lack, is the oredict altering.
The only lack, is the oredict altering.
I personally find the ATLauncher awesome for modpacks, especially since it only updates the mods that need updating, and not just 1 big zip file.
In the crash log it actually recommends Ids when the game crashes. You have to go into the folder for them though.May I just tell you now. I have attempted creating a modpack for hours over the past few weeks. It is no easy thing.
I'm currently dealing with a RotaryCraft ID conflict, I've tried about 30 different IDs and still no luck, note that this is 1.6.4.
I think I'm just going to update to 1.7 and use the mods that it brings us.
1.7 should be fine for creating though, I though it will be a lot easier to drag and drop mods without ID conflicts.
Electro magnetic coherence is to blame, thanks for the help
I think that's only for some mods, a lot of mod authors don't recommend free slots when their mod crashes due to ID conflicts.
Anyway, my modpack will be for 1.7.2 = no IDs, yay!
[DOUBLEPOST=1401139510][/DOUBLEPOST]
NP. It's what I'm here for.
Well, in testing getting rid of that mod fixed it but I just died in my survival world to a hydra and once again only my baubles stuff is there....[DOUBLEPOST=1401140383][/DOUBLEPOST]That wasn't it[DOUBLEPOST=1401140434][/DOUBLEPOST]I'm not even going to try anymore, I am going to wait til 1.7 mods are more stable and stick with 1.6 for nowI think that's only for some mods, a lot of mod authors don't recommend free slots when their mod crashes due to ID conflicts.
Anyway, my modpack will be for 1.7.2 = no IDs, yay!
NP. It's what I'm here for.
Yeah, 1.7 will be better, plus we will actually be in the same version as Vanilla players for once!
Yeah, 1.7 will be better, plus we will actually be in the same version as Vanilla players for once!
I hope thats gonna be an average thing
.Anyway, my modpack will be for 1.7.2 = no IDs, yay!
Yay, then we'll have 10.000 more pack online because everybody feels their one is the best.
(While its probably their first one, since it has become very easy to make them, because ID's died in a fire)
(Thats also why some mod-makers that do have restriction for publication, have it because they keep getting crash logs from modpacks)
(This is not meant to appeal to people who have been making packs since 1.3.2 or so)
I dont think soI hope thats gonna be an average thing
I'm not one of these Tekkit (no offence meant) users that create packs with no permissions, I want to please players and make sure they get the best experience.
I'm not one of these Tekkit (no offence meant) users that create packs with no permissions, I want to please players and make sure they get the best experience.
Thats the way modpacks should be made!
Which one? Pleasing players or no permisison?
No permission is just silly, and silly is basically MC on PS3 and Xbox, it's made on PC, it's most played on PC and it's best on PC.
I'm holding off on 1.7.2, been working on it for a bit trying to make a pack, it's just an absolute nightmare... Bigger issues being rendering bugs, with no real "fixes" due to being an outdated version of minecraft...
I honestly feel like playing 1.7.2 is a mistake, it's a good call to get things set up, and prepared before the true time to move on for modders... But overall with what there is to work with, and the number of 1.7.(number here)version, I think it should be a danm clear indicator that it was a half baked version of minecraft to begin with.. It's in a transitional stage... And with .9 we have at the very least, a final attempt at version cleanup, and the real version that we play.. Forge 1.7.9 is on the horizon, Not going to waste my sanity dealing with bugs that are on minecrafts side that are version specific.
Id conflicts were a pain in the butt, but crash loops and having to start worlds over, disabling major portions of mods because of a dumb render bug? I'll pick the poisen I deal with in one swig, that let's me enjoy the rest of the experience.
I honestly feel like playing 1.7.2 is a mistake, it's a good call to get things set up, and prepared before the true time to move on for modders... But overall with what there is to work with, and the number of 1.7.(number here)version, I think it should be a danm clear indicator that it was a half baked version of minecraft to begin with.. It's in a transitional stage... And with .9 we have at the very least, a final attempt at version cleanup, and the real version that we play.. Forge 1.7.9 is on the horizon, Not going to waste my sanity dealing with bugs that are on minecrafts side that are version specific.
Id conflicts were a pain in the butt, but crash loops and having to start worlds over, disabling major portions of mods because of a dumb render bug? I'll pick the poisen I deal with in one swig, that let's me enjoy the rest of the experience.
I'm not one of these Tekkit (no offence meant) users that create packs with no permissions, I want to please players and make sure they get the best experience.
I think thats the line what he ment.