FTB Pack Comparison
- Thread starter OmegaPython
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Well, I wouldn't say broken, but they are buggy. For example, EE3 basically doesn't work unless you manually update to a newer version. ( Can't craft minium stone or philosophers stone. )
Slowpoke said they plan to look into them tomorrow.
Leave as they are, is what I mean by 'classic'. When someone generally says 'classic' they mean to not change. I do not mean to have two branches of the same mods going. That would be silly.
We all know about your unfounded python hate. trollface.png But in terms of games/modding, there is absolutely no advantage with any other language, and indeed, most other languages would be slightly less useful in this regard due to syntax bloat and that being an extra hurdle for new programmers.
Irrelevant, see above, also consider how closely do you follow python changes, and if your dislike of the entire language stems from a few bad experiences where you have developed an outdated bias in applications that do not even apply here?
A band of bronies shall be at your door shortly looking for repentance
Necessity isn't really what the game is about is it?
Im personally not really looking for new blocks that do more stuff. Its sort of the difference between given a car, and given all the parts for a car and you have to go find all the car parts. (extreme example). *some* of the new things are *too* automated, but many are fine replacements and even improve over RP in that aspect. BC pipes need to stop fucking leaking though, because gate system is very fun and I want to use it.We are well afield now. So I'll spoiler this.
There is nothing special about game programming. It is just a set of constraints like any other project.
This is absolutely wrong. Your problem is you're mistaking your personal familiarity for simplicity. I forgive people this because many, many software engineers do this. So many that I took the time to http://dave.fayr.am/posts/2011-08-19-lets-go-shopping.html]write an essay about leaving your comfort zone as a programmer and why that is a valuable exercise.[/SIZE]
I know exactly what Python's capabilities are. It is one of the major players in my industry. I pride myself on keeping both abreast existing technologies in my space and trying to outpace them. My track record is very good here. Ask and I'll give you #humblebrag examples if you really care.
The fact Python still hs lousy "nerfed" anonymous functions is outrageous. The fact its stdlib hasn't totally moved over to a block-style a-la ruby on grounds of "simplicity" is heinous. The fact that we don't have some sort of type annotation hinting for the compiler in the core distribution is not only sad, it ignores the success of that approach in the last 20 years of programming for no practical benefit.
There is nothing special about game programming. It is just a set of constraints like any other project.
This is absolutely wrong. Your problem is you're mistaking your personal familiarity for simplicity. I forgive people this because many, many software engineers do this. So many that I took the time to http://dave.fayr.am/posts/2011-08-19-lets-go-shopping.html]write an essay about leaving your comfort zone as a programmer and why that is a valuable exercise.[/SIZE]
I know exactly what Python's capabilities are. It is one of the major players in my industry. I pride myself on keeping both abreast existing technologies in my space and trying to outpace them. My track record is very good here. Ask and I'll give you #humblebrag examples if you really care.
The fact Python still hs lousy "nerfed" anonymous functions is outrageous. The fact its stdlib hasn't totally moved over to a block-style a-la ruby on grounds of "simplicity" is heinous. The fact that we don't have some sort of type annotation hinting for the compiler in the core distribution is not only sad, it ignores the success of that approach in the last 20 years of programming for no practical benefit.
I don't know if anyone had this weird bug i found. I was using copper & tin from IC2. When i started to pulverize copper i got pulv copper and then i try to cook it in powered furnace but i could only get 1 copper ingot from any amount of pulverized ore. And this copper ingot didn't work in recipes. Other weird bug is when i cook one pulverized gold i got full stack of it. Or when i want to cook sand to glass i couldn't get any. But when i change copper & tin to thermal expansion version everything is working just fine - in pulverizer/ powered furnace & in macerator/ electric furnace. I am using industrialcraft-2_1.115.327-lf & Forge 710.
Are you on a server? Because that sounds exactly like a really bizarre case of miscommunication between the client and the server.
Anyways, does only one of the Copper Dust smelt? What's the hurdle for only being able to get 1 Copper Ingot?
For anyone having trouble launching the beta Ultimate pack, try deleting the mods and minecraft folder, so it has to redownload everything. That got it to work for me (once) and then I used MultiMC to make a copy which launches perfectly fine at this point.
The only issue I have is that there are various things causing crashes (like putting on Thaumcraft's Goggles of Revealing will crash the game every time for me, but there are also more random crashes I don't know the cause of yet). Still, it's great to finally play around with some of the new features.
The only issue I have is that there are various things causing crashes (like putting on Thaumcraft's Goggles of Revealing will crash the game every time for me, but there are also more random crashes I don't know the cause of yet). Still, it's great to finally play around with some of the new features.
Oh Mystcraft, how I have missed you! :')
Without you I had to actually walk to places...
Without you I had to actually walk to places...
Um, because it's an awesome mod, and part of the ultimate pack?
I don't need any other reasons.
I don't need any other reasons.
No! you fed the troll!
But yea it's a great mod imo.
You know what they say, all toasters toast toast.
Awesome mod-I don't think so...
Part of Ultimate-Valid reason but, am I the only one that doesn't use it...it is crap...
Most underrated thing from Xenos Reliquary: Magicbane
if it's enchanted, it's pretty much the ultimate close-range PVP weapon, next to maybe the Rapier if you're dealing with people with armor.
if it's enchanted, it's pretty much the ultimate close-range PVP weapon, next to maybe the Rapier if you're dealing with people with armor.