Ok, here's a list of the currently living players, and whether their votes on each day (in order) were (A)ntismites, (U)nreasoned (i.e. just "Vote Pyure" with unrelated nonsense), or (R)easoned (with explicit game-relevant reasoning):
sgbros: AURAA_
SE37: AARAA_
ljfa: UAUUA_
dragon: -UUUUU
RJS: UUURR_
Eru: RARR-R
Epic: UUU--U
Granted, some of the unreasoned votes on days 3 and 4 were well after the bandwagons on Vike and Nojr were well underway, and the voters probably implied that they were in agreement with the wagon without stating so explicitly.
... Am I the only person here who thinks totally unreasoned votes are more suspicious than explicit antismites? At least if you say "antimite", you're giving an indication that you don't have time to analyze everything or you just don't have anything to analyze. Not giving any reason just seems like you don't care, which doesn't say much about your alignment... but I know I, for one, tend to take less notes when I'm a wolf then when I'm a villager.
Looking at the above chart, neither Epic nor dragon_fang have made a single explicitly reasoned vote this whole game. For that reason, vote dragon_fang.