Yeah not sure where my math was going. Lost the train of thought. Looks like i missed that you said 10 generators to a reactor, so i thought it was 1:1 to get your production values.I think you might have misplaced a 0 somewhere. Each generator was and still is 16 MJ/t. I didn't change the production rate, just made it use fuel much more slowly (so each generator burns a bucket of fuel for 8m 20s, if you're getting 20 tps).
Yeah, KirinDave was absolutely right about it basically being a liquid void pipe in 1.4.7.
Did not know the generator had an output level of 16mj/t. Hard to tell that in 1.4.7 when it went through its whole fuel supply in a few seconds
So like you said reactor produces 1/10 of the old rate, so every 50 seconds / 1000 ticks a bucket is made. The generators consume a bucket over 500 seconds / 10,000 ticks.
So at that rate of fuel production you can run:
10 generators off one reactor. 160 MJ/t
vs
same setup would run 40 combustion engines at 200mj/t. But with the extra headaches that come with these engines.
vs
2 36 tank HP boilers ~288 mj/t
That is actually pretty balanced to me. Like i said earlier you lose some efficiency, but gain a lot of ease of use. If the generators auto shutoff on a full energy conduit network I would probably use them over combustion.