Would you build this?

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord

Would you build this?

  • Total voters
    405
abculatter_2 said:
RC pumps.
Click to expand...
Oh, that is true; you can overclock a water pump and get extra water:
Code: 
    int mult = 1;
     if (this.canMultiply(fluid)) {
       if (power/MINPOWER >= 16)
         mult *= 2;
       if (power/MINPOWER >= 64)
         mult *= 2;
       if (power/MINPOWER >= 256)
         mult *= 2;
       if (power/MINPOWER >= 1024)
         mult *= 2;
       if (power/MINPOWER >= 4096)
         mult *= 2;
     }
Knowing that MINPOWER = 1024, that means you can get 2x multiplication at 16kW, 4x at 65kW, 8x at 262kW, 16x at 1MW, and 32x at 4MW.
 
How does RotaryCraft's pump compare to XU's liquid transfer node with 64 mining upgrade and 64 speed upgrade?

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: YX33A
4 MW ...that is like 2 turbines or 8 Hydrokinetics just to power a pump...

But then again, by the time you have the materials for a Fusion reactor, that should be easy to get i guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abculatter_2
techno156 said:
Have you tried other forms of liquid transport? If they're faster, it might help
Click to expand...
It's not an issue of liquid transport, it's that a single ring of boilers, even if supplied with dozens of buckets/tick, will not dissipate heat fast enough to keep the neutron absorbers from melting. I had tried something like 10 infinite reservoirs per boiler, and was actively checking the boilers with an angular transducer to ensure that their tanks weren't emptying, and the absorbers would always melt regardless.

I've noticed that boilers seem to create a multiblock if stacked vertically, perhaps stacking them 2 or 3 blocks high would work.
 
EyeDeck said:
It's not an issue of liquid transport, it's that a single ring of boilers, even if supplied with dozens of buckets/tick, will not dissipate heat fast enough to keep the neutron absorbers from melting. I had tried something like 10 infinite reservoirs per boiler, and was actively checking the boilers with an angular transducer to ensure that their tanks weren't emptying, and the absorbers would always melt regardless.

I've noticed that boilers seem to create a multiblock if stacked vertically, perhaps stacking them 2 or 3 blocks high would work.
Click to expand...
Perhaps, though I do admit that for a moment, I was going to suggest more boilers, further away... :P
 
EyeDeck said:
It's not an issue of liquid transport, it's that a single ring of boilers, even if supplied with dozens of buckets/tick, will not dissipate heat fast enough to keep the neutron absorbers from melting. I had tried something like 10 infinite reservoirs per boiler, and was actively checking the boilers with an angular transducer to ensure that their tanks weren't emptying, and the absorbers would always melt regardless.

I've noticed that boilers seem to create a multiblock if stacked vertically, perhaps stacking them 2 or 3 blocks high would work.
Click to expand...
Hey EyeDeck, silly question; are you using latest version of ReactorCraft? I think he's on V19 atm. Sorry if this is already answered above.

Reika's working on building his own legitimate fusion reactor these days (when he's not pimpin out new mod code), so it'll be cool to see how his goes.

In theory I am too but...its gonna be a few days before I can actually MC at all. Bleh.
 
Pyure said:
Reika's working on building his own legitimate fusion reactor these days (when he's not pimpin out new mod code), so it'll be cool to see how his goes.
Click to expand...
That sounds dangerous, does he have the proper degrees in physics and an authorization to do it? Does he have the budget?
 
Pyure said:
Hey EyeDeck, silly question; are you using latest version of ReactorCraft? I think he's on V19 atm. Sorry if this is already answered above.

Reika's working on building his own legitimate fusion reactor these days (when he's not pimpin out new mod code), so it'll be cool to see how his goes.

In theory I am too but...its gonna be a few days before I can actually MC at all. Bleh.
Click to expand...
Last I was toying with it was on v18d.
 
EyeDeck said:
It's not an issue of liquid transport, it's that a single ring of boilers, even if supplied with dozens of buckets/tick, will not dissipate heat fast enough to keep the neutron absorbers from melting. I had tried something like 10 infinite reservoirs per boiler, and was actively checking the boilers with an angular transducer to ensure that their tanks weren't emptying, and the absorbers would always melt regardless.

I've noticed that boilers seem to create a multiblock if stacked vertically, perhaps stacking them 2 or 3 blocks high would work.
Click to expand...
I am trying this in my design.
 
Reika said:
I am trying this in my design.
Click to expand...
Well, it does seem to work.
mUYHifc.jpg
The central boilers are stacked three blocks high. The ones along the edges don't even get to 100 C, so even having boilers there at all isn't really necessary.

I guess I'll have to turn it on for a while and see how long it takes for a neutron absorber to melt. It's definitely doing better than any unstacked setup has.
 
EyeDeck said:
Well, it does seem to work.
The central boilers are stacked three blocks high. The ones along the edges don't even get to 100 C, so even having boilers there at all isn't really necessary.
I guess I'll have to turn it on for a while and see how long it takes for a neutron absorber to melt. It's definitely doing better than any unstacked setup has.
Click to expand...
I am doing a slightly different design, one I find more aesthetically pleasing:
8TuLSoS.png
 
Reika said:
I am trying this in my design.
Click to expand...
This comment and Danilus video showing stacked pebblebed reactor brings up an interesting question. You wrote the code and the answer isn't anywhere else I can find. Are reactors intended to exist in only a single Y plane, or is there benefit to stacking conventional reactors as well??
 
DriftinFool said:
This comment and Danilus video showing stacked pebblebed reactor brings up an interesting question. You wrote the code and the answer isn't anywhere else I can find. Are reactors intended to exist in only a single Y plane, or is there benefit to stacking conventional reactors as well??
Click to expand...
Increased output, at the cost of more fuel and more difficult thermal control.

The control rods and CPUs only work in one plane, so you will need to control each layer individually.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom