Werewolf: Speaker for the Dead [SIGNUP]
- Thread starter trajing
- Start date
And theoretically the protector can protect a power-role three nights in a row.
Also I had just noticed the neutral win conditions problem myself. It looks deliberate (private list of conditions). If that's how it is, we'll just need to treat sorcerers as antagonists (hidden win conditions still arent as bad as hidden powers)
Feel free to disregard this, its not super critical, just a thought:
If a sorcerer's win condition is "You must arrange the death of the investigator", can you make it public that the condition is "You will be given a role to kill. Arrange that person's death to win."
That's something we could debate about in game. "Maybe pyure voted for vikestep because pyure's a seer and his target is the investigator."
Becalm thyself friend
The issue sir is that we already don't know what everyone's motives are. That's the point of the game.
Plus, its already a mess because there's potential "traitor" abilities floating around.
I'm not saying you should change your mind or anything, I just predict a bit of strawpulling is all.
Edit: i wanna be abundantly clear that I'm not feeling bitchy or stubborn about this. I'll play whatever rules you make and be fine with it. My concerns are purely to assist you in streamlining towards the game you want to have and not the game I'm worried you might get.
I sort of see your point. Normally, if the "seer" role has to kill all sorcerers, he could just say he's not a seer. But right now the team is tied together a bit weirdly (medium/servant in particular) which should tell them each other's roles I think.
But in that case, your third-day reveal would botch this setup anyway.
Edit: WIthout knowing the conditions, I don't have any good suggestions to achieve your goal with public versions. Who cares, it'll be fun
