Just got to a quiet place I can mull over everything.
Hah what a total clusterfuck last night. Vike didn't even need to say anything, ppl just started voting guilty for no reason. And town totally deserves what happened because we laid out a very simple, honest and logical explanation for the best course of action.
Eru even made a pretty speech about how black is white before doing so. I have no notion how I'm going to defend that guy.
In short: lol
Okay last night was a disaster. I have no defense for how that turned out, it was a poorly judged call on my part. Still, that's the same line of "reasoning" I'm trying to use on all the parties, for lack of hard facts.
Now, I'd like to put eruantien on trial. His post yesterday was incredibly sketchy. He voted me on the stand, which looked to me like a bandwagon vote. He also voted both defendants guilty yesterday. All with absolutely no reasoning besides "they're inactive". He seems like a good candidate and I'd at least like to see his defence.
What do you mean "sketchy"? If by that you mean I failed to reach a valid, fact-supported conclusion then yes, I agree with that. WE HAVE NO FACTS. Inactive villagers just contribute to that problem of being in the dark about players' actions.
Hypothesis - wolves saw an opportunity to stall for time votewise. Hopped on leading to another day without a wolf on the stand. So, we have erin, eru, and Sora who all hopped onto that wagon.
Eru's talked a lot and concluded very little, is a bit trigger happy on the jailing and very pointedly abstained from voting on SE37, opting to vote KC to 'maintain a tie.'
Why did you vote for goreae to go on trial? What is your view on the reasoning I have provided above. Anything to say in your defence?
I was trying to at least post the train of thought that lead me to the "conclusions" I made. At the time of my voting, 1 vote for guilty had been placed on SE37, and 0 for KC. I wrongly thought that by voting KC, a tie would be established. At any rate, I'm still adamant that there's no better way of finding wolves in this game than by throwing them up on the stand. (Although, we HAVE lost two bodyguards in this manner. GG you guys, great defense.)
Vike you asked me a couple days ago who was on my wolflist. I didn't answer that because it was a silly trap. But here's a bone: RJS just posted my wolflist. Any of these guys would be a pain in my ass to defend because I virtually guarantee at least one of them is a wolf.
Why am I on this list? Is it for reasons similar to those raised by RJS? If not, please explain yourself. If I missed the explanation, a link would be appreciated.
Nojr: I recall saying on previous games you shouldn't fear being lynched... unless you're a power role or a wolf.
... so I'm screwed if I defend myself then? Welp, in that case this whole post has been a waste of time. However I do fear being lynched, as I'm trying to maintain being active and contributing toward the wolf hunt. I don't hold a power role, and it's not like I consider myself necessary for the continued survival of the village members. I'm not going to go into another black vs. white spiel again, because Pyure seemed to think that sort of hocus-pocus is inherently wolfy. But, I am not a wolf. If I do go on trial, I'll come back later and respond to whatever you guys accuse me of. By all means, send me to trial, but it will just be a waste of time.
*edit: almost forgot to
vote both the accused guilty, again. Also,
SoraZodia for trial.
