Okay, doing a bit more research on the current events, I see this:
Now on the serious stuff:
vote fowltief, Pyure voted him, Pyure wants to protect everybody to win, he MUST have a seriuos reason to vote fowltief.
Why would you do that? Pyure doesn't want to protect anyone. He'd much sooner see everyone eaten by wolves then see a single wolf go to jail. That's the role. His vote was an attempt to get an easily defended player on the chopping block. He has no good reason rather than that to do so. Here's some evidence to that fact:
i think the next game you have of this should be more like a game of clue... villagers have roles but do nothing( more like an alibi).. there are several weapons... and several locations " It was the butcher in the Meadow with a candle stick.." or something like that.
Especially since the poor sods on trial will already be the player who seem most suspicious. Your hill to fight up seems to be getting steeper and steeper.
You mean guys like fowltief? I vote fowltief to go on the stand, I'm concerned about all his talk about butcher knives and such.
Let me break this down for you as objectively as I can:
- Discussion was had on the futility of the defence
- fowltief suggested a clue-like variant instead of this game.
- Fraction said that whoever's on trial will be generally suspicious anyways.
- Pyure then says (assumably in response to fraction's post) fowltief was suspicious because of his suggestion involving butchers and candlesticks.
- RealKC then agrees with pyure's vote.
What I gather from this is pyure's vote was entirely BS. He just put fowltief on the block on a whim, using the butcher knife thing as jokey evidence. This is most likely to get someone easily defended on the stand so they can get a point out of tomorrow's trial. Then RealKC votes for fowl anyways assuming that pyure's on his side. When he actually isn't. The defence would sooner see the town devoured by wolves than let a single wolf go to jail. Meanwhile the prosecution would sooner see the entire town in chains than let a single villager go free. They don't care if anyone's a wolf or not, they just care that somebody/nobody goes to jail. Also, realKC's vote was really quick when you don't even need to vote. He didn't even wait for a defence or question pyure's motives or anything. He just hopped on. This is quite suspicious but I'll still wait for him to respond before I do cast my vote since it's irrevocable.
And on the topic of fowltief, he did react quite violently to the accusation. His rection was like someone waking up to find a bandwagon on them not just two votes against him. So that's another cause of concern.
