(Redstone Energy Conduit) Can someone explain the 5% loss?

  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord

Technician

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
1,139
0
0
I think conduits have a stable loss. Meaning even if it's 1 cable it loses 5% power. You can run it over 2000 blocks and it'd still carry 5% loss.
 

AlanEsh

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
907
0
0
I think conduits have a stable loss. Meaning even if it's 1 cable it loses 5% power. You can run it over 2000 blocks and it'd still carry 5% loss.
Yes this is the case. But currently if you do this:
Engine - Conduit - Energy Cell - Conduit - Energy Cell - Conduit
You've incurred 3 instances of -5%.
 

noobbyte

Active Member
Jul 29, 2019
37
0
26
yeah i suppose that works, but the space requirements for that might mess up a potentially compact and neat build

EDIT: sorry, should have quoted but i'm not sure how to aside from the "reply" button
 

nimzy

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
12
0
0
That's right, people would rather take a flat 5% tax on generated MJ over dealing with BC's awful conductive pipes. The truth hurts.
 

Technician

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
1,139
0
0
Uhm.. the man that made the Tesseracts states otherwise..?

I don't get that. Redstone Conduits lose 5%, and Tesseracts lose 12% 5 + 12 = 17

How in the hell did I add that wrong lol!

Anyway, since he was reading this thread, KingLemming even away from your mod you are amazing.
 

Summit

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
327
0
0
I don't get that. Redstone Conduits lose 5%, and Tesseracts lose 12% 5 + 12 = 17

How in the hell did I add that wrong lol!

Anyway, since he was reading this thread, KingLemming even away from your mod you are amazing.
Because unless you changed your configs tesseracts lose 25%, not 12%.
 

Whovian

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
1,181
0
1
I don't get that. Redstone Conduits lose 5%, and Tesseracts lose 12% 5 + 12 = 17

First, what Summit pointed out.

Second, combinatorics. When you shove your energy into a Tesseract, its total gets multiplied by .75 to get the total MJ output, and when you shove your energy through a Conduit system, its total gets multiplied by .95. Thus, going through both gets you 75%*95%=71.25% of the original total, or a 28.75% loss.

I know it's confusing. ;)
 

Summit

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
327
0
0
Nah, makes perfect sense, and if people need an example: If you stick 1,000 MJ into the tesseract you will get (1,000 * .7125) = 712.5 MJ out of the conduit on the other side of the tesseract. Simple.
 

SkyBoy96

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
100
0
0
Let me explain the above concept in laymans terms: The tesseract gets 100 mj, and spits out 75 mj. The conduit hooked up to the tesseract gets 75 mj, and spits out 71.25 mj at the end of its line. The loss is deducted from what it gets, not what it was originally given
 

Vaygrim

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
533
0
0
First, what Summit pointed out.

Second, combinatorics. When you shove your energy into a Tesseract, its total gets multiplied by .75 to get the total MJ output, and when you shove your energy through a Conduit system, its total gets multiplied by .95. Thus, going through both gets you 75%*95%=71.25% of the original total, or a 28.75% loss.

I know it's confusing. ;)

Listen to Whovian and King Lemming. It is an initial 25% unless you went in and changed your config files.