I can't use the liquiducts, because boiler and engines are in different dimensions ^_^the limit is not in the frequency itself but with the amount the tesseract accepts on each side of it i dont remember the numbers but i know there is a limit to what each tesseract can recieve and send and when it comes to steam i would recommend just using liquiducts to connect to the engines as close to the boiler itself and then use a pair of energy tesseracts instead
the limit is not in the frequency itself but with the amount the tesseract accepts on each side of it i dont remember the numbers but i know there is a limit to what each tesseract can recieve and send and when it comes to steam i would recommend just using liquiducts to connect to the engines as close to the boiler itself and then use a pair of energy tesseracts instead
This is a terrible idea.
To OP, each tesseract will accept up to 160mb per side. Since a 36HP boiler outputs 720 mb max, this means you need 5 points of connection on the input tesseract. The output tesseract will output as much as it recieves, though, so you can connect multiple input tesseracts to a single output tesseract and power as many engines/turbines as you want from that single tesseract without losing power the way you would with an energy tesseract.
Or if you are running Ultimate, use power converters.
Don't liquiducts have a maximum transfer rate? If so then you definitely can't output an unlimited amount,
its the boiler and tesseracts sides that are limited. The liquiducts will move as much liquid as you need.
That's 18 engines!Huh. For some reason I was under the impression that a 36 HP boiler could only support 18 industrial engines at full power, not 20.
At any rate, I've never used tesseracts for liquids. Are endertanks even comparable, or do you usually just want to roll with tesseracts for a large-scale operation like this?
That's 18 engines!
Actually, I've never did such kind of interdimensional liquid transfer. I decided to go with tesseracts since I don't have a blaze farm yet, and for items they are more convenient for me than ender chests in this case
Oh. Well, I guess my impression was right. I just need to learn to count.
Hmm. I use endertanks for my thermal generators which works out well for me, but I've never used them to transfer large amounts of liquids like this. If the endertanks are too large of a bottleneck, I may have to just use tesseracts.
Tesseracts do not have a throughput limit, they act as remote connections, and anything you put in, comes out.
Liquiducts, on the other hand, have a limit of 160 mB/t on a given connection.
Oh, thank you again! But, could you explain, please, why those 18 engines are getting enough steam through only 4 connections?Tesseracts do not have a throughput limit, they act as remote connections, and anything you put in, comes out.
Liquiducts, on the other hand, have a limit of 160 mB/t on a given connection.