I'm caught up. My mind has not changed, I don't agree with your reasoning on RJS either.Keep reading.
I'm caught up. My mind has not changed, I don't agree with your reasoning on RJS either.Keep reading.
So... I'm probably missing something here, but if you're now convinced that J is not one particular town role, why did that put him in your list of townreads? Again, I most likely missed something, but wat.The Arsonist protected someone last night. Can the person protected stand up and say hi please?
(I actually have a track record of getting protected by the bodyguard on N1, but I didn't get a message from the GM. Also: The_J isn't the arsonist, because he always protects me N1 <3 <3 <3)
...you're joking right? This isn't someone else using your login? You saw what went down with bigd and you're pretending to be surprised that anyone pursued it?I'm caught up. My mind has not changed, I don't agree with your reasoning on RJS either.
Vote where you want. If you want to hit a traitor, vote RJS. I'm telling you with strong confidence he's a traitor (or counter-terrorist). If you think a traitor would put himself on the line like this for no reason, that's your prerogative (although I find it a bit insulting)So... I'm probably missing something here, but if you're now convinced that J is not one particular town role, why did that put him in your list of townreads? Again, I most likely missed something, but wat.
I'm also not convinced by the reasoning against RJS, especially after seeing his response to it. Gonna hold off on voting for now, but I might end up agreeing with Vike.
I don't care if you consider my view. I'm reviewing your posts in light of your very quick jump on me, and its not computing. You voted me before you even finished reading the day's posts. Rule #1 of scumhunting: don't make the discussion about you, make it about the scum you're hunting.Pyure, address all 5 of my points and I'll consider your view.
Hi there, I'd like to make the discussion about you. You just tried to deflect a pretty valid accusation.I don't care if you consider my view. I'm reviewing your posts in light of your very quick jump on me, and its not computing. You voted me before you even finished reading the day's posts. Rule #1 of scumhunting: don't make the discussion about you, make it about the scum you're hunting.
Also, I'm not really clear who "he" is in your 5 points.
Wait, don't leave us hanging here. Are you saying that one of your previous statements is false?So uh I forgot how arsonists work.
Carry on.
your post was so uncharacteristic of you that I didn't even need to see the rest of your posts. And when I did it didn't change my mind.I don't care if you consider my view. I'm reviewing your posts in light of your very quick jump on me, and its not computing. You voted me before you even finished reading the day's posts. Rule #1 of scumhunting: don't make the discussion about you, make it about the scum you're hunting.
Also, I'm not really clear who "he" is in your 5 points.
That's how Pyure works--he's always a bit off, town or wolf.your post was so uncharacteristic of you that I didn't even need to see the rest of your posts. And when I did it didn't change my mind.
I don't agree, that's now how Pyure is lol.That's how Pyure works--he's always a bit off, town or wolf.
So now I'm flip-flopping between RJS and you, Vike, to vote on. Think I'll sleep on it, but it'll be one of you two that gets my vote.
Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk
I don't think anyone minds when someone edits their posts to fix a typo.not how*
I don't really like it when anyone edits posts because they could have edited some other part of the message and we'd never know.I don't think anyone minds when someone edits their posts to fix a typo.
If one does that, they are cheating knowingly and if they win, they'd know it wasn't fair and square.I don't really like it when anyone edits posts because they could have edited some other part of the message and we'd never know.
Yeah, but regardless they might do it and people might not know that's what they did.If one does that, they are cheating knowingly and if they win, they'd know it wasn't fair and square.
Cheaters never win.
If you don't vote for a day, you can get smitten. If you don't know who to vote or don't know if you'll have time to more carefully determine your vote today, you can vote on someone who is not in danger of being lynched.What does antismite mean?