Umm... What the hell is this?
http://au.ign.com/articles/2015/01/15/minecraft-the-simpsons-skins-revealed
http://au.ign.com/articles/2015/01/15/minecraft-the-simpsons-skins-revealed
If you read the first sentence of the article you would know it's for XboxUmm... What the hell is this?
http://au.ign.com/articles/2015/01/15/minecraft-the-simpsons-skins-revealed
Still, DLC for freaking Minecraft!If you read the first sentence of the article you would know it's for Xbox
Xbox has DLC's. They have had skin packs and such for a while.Still, DLC for freaking Minecraft!
Why? Why the hell would Xbox users put up with that?Xbox has DLC's. They have had skin packs and such for a while.
Well, resource packs aren't exactly on the top priority list, and the skin packs aren't really expensive, so I don't think its a big deal for them.Why? Why the hell would Xbox users put up with that?
That is just throwing money away, don't they ever look at the freedom PC users have?Well, resource packs aren't exactly on the top priority list, and the skin packs aren't really expensive, so I don't think its a big deal for them.
Who knows, they might like Xbox more..?That is just throwing money away, don't they ever look at the freedom PC users have?
But why would they put up with it, it should be a free service.Who knows, they might like Xbox more..?
For the same reason people pay money on servers for capes and hats.But why would they put up with it, it should be a free service.
Real question to me is: Why the hell would anyone choose to play MC on a console in the first place...Why? Why the hell would Xbox users put up with that?
Think about that. An 864x864 world size
I wouldn't mind paying more for MC in some form if we got some better development on better performance and mod support.They also charge for texture packs... So dumb.This is what I am scared off for the PC version...