Anyone else watching the MC "Snapshots"?

  • Please make sure you are posting in the correct place. Server ads go here and modpack bugs go here
  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Hambeau

Hambeau

Over-Achiever
Jul 24, 2013
2,598
1,531
213
Yesterday's 14w29a/b snapshots from Mojang have added threading to world generation... This results in almost instantaneous terrain generation without, so far, any of the missing swaths of land that previous versions had. There are also a few new settings for video and they've smoothed out the fps operation a bit.

They say they'll be threading chunk refreshing next and expect a similar performance increase from that.

1.8 is shaping up to be a good vintage for MC, in my opinion :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: PierceSG, 1SDAN, Not_Steve and 7 others
McJty

McJty

Over-Achiever
Mod Developer
May 13, 2014
2,015
2,519
228
twitter.com
I'm following the snapshots a bit and I must say they are doing some nice things. Really looking forward to playing 1.8 with mods in some (hopefully not *too* distant) future :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1SDAN and unknown zombie
M

MigukNamja

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
2,202
0
0
If they get chunk updates properly multi-threaded 1.8 *should* be the release that makes large servers much more common.

However, vMC improving server performance via multi-threading might not easily translate to Forge being able to do the same. There indeed may be significant multi-threading work needed in Forge as well. Multi-threading the right way is not easy. Brute-force approach of mutex'ing everything may cause performance hit. It has to be done well to be fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Museli, 1SDAN, Padfoote and 5 others
Pyure

Pyure

Not Totally Useless
Aug 14, 2013
8,334
7,191
383
Waterloo, Ontario
MigukNamja said:
Multi-threading the right way is not easy. Brute-force approach of mutex'ing everything may cause performance hit. It has to be done well to be fast.
Click to expand...
I run into this every day at work. I have to have the right frame of mind that day or I'll refuse to tinker with multithreading at all. Some days I just can't wrap my brain around it and still do it justice.

And does it ever make debugging a nightmare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1SDAN and AlCapella
R

ratchet freak

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2012
1,198
243
79
MigukNamja said:
If they get chunk updates properly multi-threaded 1.8 *should* be the release that makes large servers much more common.

However, vMC improving server performance via multi-threading might not easily translate to Forge being able to do the same. There indeed may be significant multi-threading work needed in Forge as well. Multi-threading the right way is not easy. Brute-force approach of mutex'ing everything will cause performance hit. It has to be done well to be fast.
Click to expand...
FTFY if you mutex everything than only 1 thread at a time may run and acquiring a mutex is non trivial, having multiple that you need to get (one mutex for each chunk for example) leads to fun deadlocks rather fast
 
  • Like
Reactions: MigukNamja
M

MigukNamja

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
2,202
0
0
ratchet freak said:
FTFY if you mutex everything than only 1 thread at a time may run and acquiring a mutex is non trivial, having multiple that you need to get (one mutex for each chunk for example) leads to fun deadlocks rather fast
Click to expand...

Exactly, yes. Textbook example is threads A and B with resources 1 and 2.

Both A and B need to write to 1 and 2 at the same time. Thread A grabs 1, then is swapped out before it can grab 2. Thread B grab 2, then is swapped out before it can grab 1.

Now we have A deadlocked waiting on 2 and B deadlocked waiting on 1. Neither thread releases nor moves forward.

Indeed, multi-threading is not for dummies and has to be done carefully to avoid situations like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlCapella
A

AlCapella

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
709
0
0
Hambeau said:
Yesterday's 14w29a/b snapshots from Mojang have added threading to world generation... This results in almost instantaneous terrain generation without, so far, any of the missing swaths of land that previous versions had. There are also a few new settings for video and they've smoothed out the fps operation a bit.

They say they'll be threading chunk refreshing next and expect a similar performance increase from that.

1.8 is shaping up to be a good vintage for MC, in my opinion :D
Click to expand...

Just a quick thanks for sharing this with the rest of us. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: L0NExW0LF and MigukNamja
asb3pe

asb3pe

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
2,704
1
1
Loaded up snapshot "b" to try it out. I spawned, and right in front of me was a chunk loading error, I could see all the way down to the lava until I flew away.

Some things never change I guess. :)

But yeah, the chunks did load faster, but creative flight is pretty darn slow (compared to, say, flying around in a Modular PowerSuit) so I couldn't really get a good feel for just how fast I could push the chunks. I often outpace chunk-loading when flying around in my Monster FTB world.

I'd say I was intrigued, but not astounded, by the speed.
 
W

Wagon153

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
3,148
-3
1
I just loaded up the latest snapshot and...
Not super impressed. The chunks did load faster, but I noticed an overall FPS drop(small, but still), and chunk errors happened even more frequently, persisting even after doing F3+A. They only went away after decreasing my render distance.
 
Hambeau

Hambeau

Over-Achiever
Jul 24, 2013
2,598
1,531
213
I saw tweets from Mojang this morning showing this week's progress concerning multithreading the worldgen...

Jeb shows an image with a 32 chunk render distance. Runs in 2GB but generates "a little slow" due to 65 * 65 total chunks generating:

https://twitter.com/jeb_/status/491615857400086528

Searge tweets that Advanced OpenGL may be going away.

https://twitter.com/SeargeDP/status/491613295548567552

Searge also says they found and fixed the missing chunk issue from last week.

https://twitter.com/SeargeDP/statuses/491574028163747840
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedBoss
buggirlexpres

buggirlexpres

Relatable Gamer
Trusted User
Retired Staff
Nov 24, 2012
3,937
7,362
663
she/her
twitter.com
  • Like
Reactions: Padfoote
asb3pe

asb3pe

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
2,704
1
1
Gideonseymour said:
Because the human eye can totally process 1082 Frames Per Second. :p
Click to expand...

Maybe the eye can't, but maybe the brain can? 'Subliminal Perception' ring a bell, perhaps? :)

I'd say this is biggest news for the folks with older, slower computers who run at 10% of the speed of the high end systems... so 1082 fps on those will be 108 fps on theirs, and everybody is happy? :D
 
buggirlexpres

buggirlexpres

Relatable Gamer
Trusted User
Retired Staff
Nov 24, 2012
3,937
7,362
663
she/her
twitter.com
asb3pe said:
Maybe the eye can't, but maybe the brain can? 'Subliminal Perception' ring a bell, perhaps? :)

I'd say this is biggest news for the folks with older, slower computers who run at 10% of the speed of the high end systems... so 1082 fps on those will be 108 fps on theirs, and everybody is happy? :D
Click to expand...
The human eye can only process 60 FPS


Sent from my Genetic Lifeform and Disk Operating System using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom