1.7.x Packs Yet!? [Mindcrack/DW20/Ultimate/Lite/Horizons/Monster/Unleashed/Unhinged/Tech/Magic/etc]

  • Please make sure you are posting in the correct place. Server ads go here and modpack bugs go here
  • The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Bigglesworth

Bigglesworth

New Member
Jul 29, 2019
1,072
0
1
So instead of asking if FTB is 1.X.X yet and getting murdered in my sleep, I thought I'd make a spreadsheet. Currently the lists I find dont have an option (yet?) to filter by mod-pack. As I use the Mindcrack pack that's what im going to start with (omgwtfbbq more packs added). If anything this can be useful to see about what % we have to go till this modpack is full 1.x.x ready.

Code: 
-> No:  means no sign from the author of plans to make an updated version and no version works with the current MC version.
-> Dev: means the mod has (planned) versions for 1.x.x but they are either in development, or unstable.
-> Yes: Stable version available for this MC version.


- Let me know if something needs fixing or updating. -​


(✌ﾟ∀ﾟ)☞MEGA ULTRA SUPER SPREADSHEET ATTACK☜(ﾟヮﾟ☜)


Note: Packs Unleashed and Unhinged are 1.5.x packs but very close to being able to go 1.6.x.​
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: angelnc, Vaupell, Hambeau and 15 others
  • Like
Reactions: Lambert2191
Those lists help, but I dont use all those mods. Indeed, very few people use ALL those mods. This list is filtered to the Mindcrack pack so people that use this pack (and others if I I/others want to add) can see at a glance how much progress their pack is making to completion.

Until one of those lists provide a per-pack filter, this is more practical and useful for me.
 
Bigglesworth said:
Considering making another column for 'in early progress' or something.
Click to expand...

Why not just use "No" in red to define "No progress on 1.5 made at all", "Yes" in green to define "1.5.X version released", and then "Yes" in yellow/orange to define "1.5.X version in beta/progress". You could also go with "Soon", although make sure to imagemap the image to link all instances of that to that one Shoop-sheep-soon picture.
 
Bigglesworth said:
Its actively being ported with official betas labled by the author for 1.5 here http://ic2api.player.to:8080/job/IC2_lf/changes
Click to expand...

And do you know what hte red dot means?
The port doesn't even work due to compile errors. They might have another version internaly available which works, but there is NO public version available not even an Alpha/Beta one.

I think what Guswut said is a good addition to your list.

EDIT:
PS: If this post sounds somewhat rude to you i apologize, i did not mean to be rude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guswut
Guswut said:
Why not just use "No" in red to define "No progress on 1.5 made at all", "Yes" in green to define "1.5.X version released", and then "Yes" in yellow/orange to define "1.5.X version in beta/progress". You could also go with "Soon", although make sure to imagemap the image to link all instances of that to that one Shoop-sheep-soon picture.
Click to expand...

Ive considered that as well, but i cant really know if there is progress being made or not on these. Not all authors do public commits. For practical means it might be ok to do it I guess. perhaps I will change the background on the 1.5 column to be either red or green to indicate 'working' and 'non-working'.

zomg new color
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guswut
Went through this morning and found several more that I read are in development for 1.5. More could be too, but I am not finding anything from the author that says they are or any betas. If others find something let me know.. Also starting to try and organize the list some.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom