Your build is more then fine for FTB and normal minecraft, I'd say it would suffice for pretty much all games (but not at highest settings).
And to pitch in on the SSD topic, some people say it makes it faster, some people say you barely see it in world performance.
But here is the thing, what makes SSD so much faster for certain things are mainly the IOPs and not the actual read/write speed.
I have 15k SAS HDDs (server version of normal SATA HDDs) in my system for most stuff (windows, large files, text files etc.) and I have a 128GB SSD for some games, including minecraft. Now, IOPs are basically the amount of in/output / read/write actions a disk can perform in a second, conventional SATA drives will give you about 120 ~ 150 IOPs, mine have about 230 IOPs ish, a modern day SSD will have at least 60-80 thousand IOPs. This basically means it can do a whole bunch of small things in great succession compared to normal HDDs, like rendering a minecraft map, which consists out of a lot of small files, it will also boost map loading on open world games a lot (think WoW, GTA, Skyrim, etc.), however, the writing / reading of single big files will not benefit from high IOPs. For example, my windows 8 boots in 7,8 seconds (post screen to completely ready for use) and windows is on my 'normal' SAS drive, I tested it with the SSD and it was merely decreased to 7,6 seconds. So that's obviously faster, but not in real world performance, however, rendering a minecraft world on my SAS drive took about 20 secs, where it took about 4-5 secs on my SSD, again, lots of small files, I tested this with a simple server setup for DW20 pack both runs with the same seed.
So to sum it up:
Are you going to play only MC / FTB singleplayer, you will benefit from a SSD.
Are you going to mainly / only play multiplayer, you will BARELY benefit from a SSD (launching the game itself will go quicker though).
Are you going to play other games with open world maps? (WoW, GTA, Skyrim, basically any MMORPG), you will benefit from a SSD.
Are you going to play mainly multiplayer MC / FTB + some other games (not open world)? Then don't buy a SSD, it's a waste of money.
Hope this helps you
EDIT: If you do go with SSD, go with a Samsung one, they are currently the best in terms of quality, the small speed difference it may or may not have can't be noticed in real world situations.
Another EDIT: A 500 / 550watt PSU will suffice easily btw, 600watt is what most people will suggest you at least, and I can tell you from personal experience and expertise that thats straight out BS, I've build and seen systems with the latest i7's and a bulkier graphics card then yours run fine on 500watt and pass benchmarks fine so. But if you think you might add another graphics card or change it later on, then investing in the 600watt one now will save you later
And to pitch in on the SSD topic, some people say it makes it faster, some people say you barely see it in world performance.
But here is the thing, what makes SSD so much faster for certain things are mainly the IOPs and not the actual read/write speed.
I have 15k SAS HDDs (server version of normal SATA HDDs) in my system for most stuff (windows, large files, text files etc.) and I have a 128GB SSD for some games, including minecraft. Now, IOPs are basically the amount of in/output / read/write actions a disk can perform in a second, conventional SATA drives will give you about 120 ~ 150 IOPs, mine have about 230 IOPs ish, a modern day SSD will have at least 60-80 thousand IOPs. This basically means it can do a whole bunch of small things in great succession compared to normal HDDs, like rendering a minecraft map, which consists out of a lot of small files, it will also boost map loading on open world games a lot (think WoW, GTA, Skyrim, etc.), however, the writing / reading of single big files will not benefit from high IOPs. For example, my windows 8 boots in 7,8 seconds (post screen to completely ready for use) and windows is on my 'normal' SAS drive, I tested it with the SSD and it was merely decreased to 7,6 seconds. So that's obviously faster, but not in real world performance, however, rendering a minecraft world on my SAS drive took about 20 secs, where it took about 4-5 secs on my SSD, again, lots of small files, I tested this with a simple server setup for DW20 pack both runs with the same seed.
So to sum it up:
Are you going to play only MC / FTB singleplayer, you will benefit from a SSD.
Are you going to mainly / only play multiplayer, you will BARELY benefit from a SSD (launching the game itself will go quicker though).
Are you going to play other games with open world maps? (WoW, GTA, Skyrim, basically any MMORPG), you will benefit from a SSD.
Are you going to play mainly multiplayer MC / FTB + some other games (not open world)? Then don't buy a SSD, it's a waste of money.
Hope this helps you
EDIT: If you do go with SSD, go with a Samsung one, they are currently the best in terms of quality, the small speed difference it may or may not have can't be noticed in real world situations.
Another EDIT: A 500 / 550watt PSU will suffice easily btw, 600watt is what most people will suggest you at least, and I can tell you from personal experience and expertise that thats straight out BS, I've build and seen systems with the latest i7's and a bulkier graphics card then yours run fine on 500watt and pass benchmarks fine so. But if you think you might add another graphics card or change it later on, then investing in the 600watt one now will save you later
Last edited: