Werewolf - Villagers vs. Zombies - Signup thread
- Thread starter ljfa
- Start date
Bugging CoolSquid is my next favorite game next to WW.
Bugging people in general is one of my favorite hobbys next to gaming.
- Which actions constitute "attacks"?
- Will the player/public get any feedback if immunity is triggered?
- If any targeted, non-beneficial action is an "attack", then what happens if FZ is "attacked" by Mystcraft Villager? No players get switched at all?
Pyure: I'd like to use my Mystcraft ability on Cheese and Xtord to switch their action-receptions.
ljfa (nightly summary time!): Cheese is immune, so xTordX will now receive Pyure's Cheese's actions, and Cheese will continue to receive Cheese's actions.
Pyure (Channeling tordly): ...oooo.....kay.
1. Anything that kills you. Basically, they can only be killed by lynching (or smiting, maybe I should add that ^^).
2. Dammit, I didn't think about this at all...this ability sure is revealing...I guess only the player who tried to kill the Furious Zombie will get to know that it didn't work. I'm not sure if the Zombie himself shuold get notified.
It was @SpwnX 's suggestion. How would you handle it?
Subject to SpwnX's approval, I'd say your own idea works just fine. Notify the "attacker" that their victim was immune. Its up to them to convince anyone else. If you feel like this is too kind to the attacker, notify the zombie as well. Its not much, but that small amount of information might make a difference.
I saw your edits go in 
Can you mention either "killing attacks" or explicitly list Farmer, Butcher, Blacksmith, Iron Golem, Enderman? (which have killing attacks.)
Technically Mystcraft and Witchery villager actions can be attacks but FZ isn't immune from what you said above.
Can you mention either "killing attacks" or explicitly list Farmer, Butcher, Blacksmith, Iron Golem, Enderman? (which have killing attacks.)
Technically Mystcraft and Witchery villager actions can be attacks but FZ isn't immune from what you said above.
The attacker wouldn't necessarily be able to guarantee that the immune person was the the person they targeted, because they may have hit someone who was swapped.
That's good actually, that way the attacker isn't exposed.
Fraction2: Agreed, good point. Drama ensues!
I agree with fraction here.
The attacker will be notified that his attack failed.
The FZ will be notified that someone tried to target him.
The swapping will only mess up what people get from.
X is FZ, Y is regular, Z is attacker.
X and Y are swapped.
Z attacks Y, hits X but only get acknowledge that his attack failed.
X is notified of the attack.
Y is not notified at all.
The attacker will be notified that his attack failed.
The FZ will be notified that someone tried to target him.
The swapping will only mess up what people get from.
X is FZ, Y is regular, Z is attacker.
X and Y are swapped.
Z attacks Y, hits X but only get acknowledge that his attack failed.
X is notified of the attack.
Y is not notified at all.
Get used to it, this one might be a bit messy. That Mystcraft villager is gonna screw logic up badly