Werewolf: Unfair, wolf! [Game Thread]

[dwappo]

I think I'm going to keep my suspicion and vote Nojr

 

[SkeletonPunk]

Vote nojr

 

[pc_assassin]

Vote Nojr

Sorry again I don't know if I will get to this thread anytime before the day ends this week so I'm being sure to vote early
----------------------------------------------------
Sent From Something That You Won't Care About Using Tapatalk 2

 

[SpwnX]

Vote 016Nojr

Because potato reasons.

 

[016Nojr]

Wohoo! Vote for me vote LivingAngryCheese

 

[Muse Clio]

vote LivingAngryCheese because other people does and i dont think Nojr has been acting suspicious enough for a vote

 

[VikeStep]

wow... Muse Clio is Nojr... Guys I think nojr is inno. It all make sense now. Especially on how he was adamant that his rule still worked even though we posted its flaw.

vote redacted

 

[pc_assassin]

wow... Muse Clio is Nojr... Guys I think nojr is inno. It all make sense now. Especially on how he was adamant that his rule still worked even though we posted its flaw.

vote redacted

Umm now you have to vote for cheese as per the new rule written last night

----------------------------------------------------
Sent From Something That You Won't Care About Using Tapatalk 2

 

[VikeStep]

Umm now you have to vote for cheese as per the new rule written last night

----------------------------------------------------
Sent From Something That You Won't Care About Using Tapatalk 2

... no we don't. He botched the role up so his rule logically implies that we only need vote for whoever muse clio votes if he hasnt voted. if he has voted then vote for whoever you want. This is why correct grammar is integral in a role playing game about computers

 

[Jus2beast]

For now Il vote Nojr, Il just wait to see what new things have unravelled when I get back from Uni

 

[SkeletonPunk]

It may just be I am tired or something, but I am SO confused right now. I am going to keep my vote for nojr and look through the pages a little.

 

[goreae]

... no we don't. He botched the role up so his rule logically implies that we only need vote for whoever muse clio votes if he hasnt voted. if he has voted then vote for whoever you want. This is why correct grammar is integral in a role playing game about computers

You are motly correct, but this one feels the need to correct you thouroughly anyways for some reason.

"All white hats must vote for the person Muse Clio voted for, if Muse Clio havent voted yet. Feel free to vote whatever you want!"

For clarity, this one has decided to use code as it seems most relevant to the situation.

if not Clio.hasVoted then
Player.vote = Clio.vote
end
player.vote=read()

Translated, this means if clio has not voted, the player must vote for what clio has voted for. Player can vote for whomever he choses. Your interpretation looks more like this:

if not Clio.hasVoted then
Player.vote = Clio.vote
else
player.vote=read()
end

The difference is this rule now actually negates all other voting rules all the time. In your version, it would only negate them if clio had voted. Therefore, since this rule now allows it by saying one can vote for whomever they choose, This one votes goreae.

 

[VikeStep]

You are motly correct, but this one feels the need to correct you thouroughly anyways for some reason.

For clarity, this one has decided to use code as it seems most relevant to the situation.

if not Clio.hasVoted then
Player.vote = Clio.vote
end
player.vote=read()

Translated, this means if clio has not voted, the player must vote for what clio has voted for. Player can vote for whomever he choses. Your interpretation looks more like this:

if not Clio.hasVoted then
Player.vote = Clio.vote
else
player.vote=read()
end

The difference is this rule now actually negates all other voting rules all the time. In your version, it would only negate them if clio had voted. Therefore, since this rule now allows it by saying one can vote for whomever they choose, This one votes goreae.

still the same output. I added what I thought was an implied return in the if statement of your first example.

 

[SkeletonPunk]

I am still confused... Do I have to change my vote now?

 

[VikeStep]

Nope

 

[goreae]

I am still confused... Do I have to change my vote now?

You do not. You may vote for whoever you choose, including yourself.

 

[SkeletonPunk]

You do not. You may vote for whoever you choose, including yourself.

oh ok. Vote shazam08[DOUBLEPOST=1413786602][/DOUBLEPOST]

oh ok. Vote shazam08

wait, am I allowed to do that?! cause if I am I think we should all smite shazam!

 

[goreae]

oh ok. Vote shazam08[DOUBLEPOST=1413786602][/DOUBLEPOST]
wait, am I allowed to do that?! cause if I am I think we should all smite shazam!

Shazam is not a player, therefore cannot be voted for.Might as well vote for lawbroken. However, the rules don't specify who you have to vote for, only that you must vote.

 

[SkeletonPunk]

ah, darnit, vote Nojr again I guess

 

[LivingAngryCheese]

Dammit goreae didn't say this one. I thought he just had to say that in every post