And you were less ok with sacrificing a potential villager? Hence why you launched locked guilty votes without waiting to see any of the discussion that was going to occur. After all, Leth's vote counted for nothing in terms of sacrifice or not. Yours however did.@RJS the reason I voted leth guilty was because after all the arguments that were made making it pretty clear that we shouldn't vite for people the defendants vote he still voted fowl + the fact that he was ok with sacrificing a posible villager.
Now that I think about it, the reason I had to vote sg guilty was because he was pretty inactive, but it looks like that's his playstyle.
The reason I voted myself is because I wanted to generate discussion. I believe I've already mentioned that and vike told me to never to do that again.
And generate discussion about what exactly? In what way did voting for yourself generate any more discussion than voting for somebody that you considered to be wolfy?
In my experience, there are very few reasons that people put a vote on themselves. Either they are a wolf and feel that they have no way out of whatever they have been caught with, they are an incredibly unsubtle jester, or they are a wolf trying to make themselves look like a jester.
Your explanations here are giving me the feeling of a rolling stone, KC...
cos I can't get no satisfaction from them.