I'm like 4300/100 percent sure that we didn't have roles yesterday, RJS couldn't possibly have been a wolf.
Trials of Murder [GAME THREAD]
- Thread starter LivingAngryCheese
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
I'm like 4300/100 percent sure that we didn't have roles yesterday, RJS couldn't possibly have been a wolf.
Note: time zones are a thing. He likely wasn't talking about yesterday in-game but rather yesterday IRL.
Well that's silly. Who actually has a life outside werewolf?
P.S. Eveyrbody should use Pyure Civilised time.
Welcome to A-levels. Where the courses are torture but at least you have it better than IB.Shit man, and I thought I had it bad with 5
Recap in 20 minutes or so
The town gathered. Well, most of the town. Someone was missing... ah, yes. Frederikam. He must've been next on the murderers' list. Anyway, you had voted to bring lethosos into the court room. The prosecution, realising that they hadn't chose anyone, chose sgbros1, and pretended that they had chosen him for a reason.
Frederikam was killed!
Sg and leth are now on trial!
Today you will vote guilty or innocent for leth and sg, and vote on a new person to put on trial!
Frederikam was killed!
Sg and leth are now on trial!
Today you will vote guilty or innocent for leth and sg, and vote on a new person to put on trial!
Just came back from reading a book and saw this.
WHAT IS THIS. I DEMAND A LAWYER. I HAVE A RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY AND ONE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ME SHOULD I NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD ONE.
WHAT IS THIS. I DEMAND A LAWYER. I HAVE A RIGHT TO AN ATTORNEY AND ONE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ME SHOULD I NOT BE ABLE TO AFFORD ONE.
Firstly on the account of Lethosos. Lethosos is guilty of all charges.
These charges include but are not restricted to
- Treason
- Wolfiness
- Lack of Towniness
I advise that all those in the Jury also vote Guilty due to the limited player. Voting innocent here will achieve nothing.
These charges include but are not restricted to
- Treason
- Wolfiness
- Lack of Towniness
I advise that all those in the Jury also vote Guilty due to the limited player. Voting innocent here will achieve nothing.
Sgbros1 has been brought forward to trial by the prosecution in this occasion.
Secondly on the account of sgbros1. sgbros1 is guilty of all charges.
The charges include:
- Not posting anything remotely helpful during the day
- Lurking and letting the game play out while they watch from above.
- Coming back to the thread only when they were accused.
The only post sgbros1 made this day was:
Secondly on the account of sgbros1. sgbros1 is guilty of all charges.
The charges include:
- Not posting anything remotely helpful during the day
- Lurking and letting the game play out while they watch from above.
- Coming back to the thread only when they were accused.
The only post sgbros1 made this day was:
This post was not helpful but also displayed that sgbros was reading the thread and had the ability to reply during the day. Why did this not happen you ask yourself? Surely a town player would see that more information is needed to make a good decision. But what if sgbros is wolf? Well then he will have nothing to critique, nothing of substance for him to be found wolfy of. This level of inactivity is not tolerated and is deserving of the guilty verdict.
I would like to point out that the intent of the defense in this trial will be to do anything to find a player innocent, even a murderer. The prosecution advises the jury to carefully decide the outcome in this trial as reluctance to find a murderer guilty may be seen negatively in the eyes of the court, the prosecution and the rest of the Jury.
Here are some of the main arguments against Lethosos from yesterday, if you missed them.
As for sg... We were throwing his name around some, but I really thought he would've done more by now. He didn't vote yesterday. He didn't even contribute to discussion. Anyone flying that low under the radar should at the very least be under scrutiny.
Lethosos and sgbros1 are guilty
Don't forget we need to nominate another person for trial tomorrow, by the way. I encourage the defendants, defense, and everyone else to offer their opinions on suspicious players.
As for sg... We were throwing his name around some, but I really thought he would've done more by now. He didn't vote yesterday. He didn't even contribute to discussion. Anyone flying that low under the radar should at the very least be under scrutiny.
Lethosos and sgbros1 are guilty
Don't forget we need to nominate another person for trial tomorrow, by the way. I encourage the defendants, defense, and everyone else to offer their opinions on suspicious players.
sg is guilty for
-not contributing to any game I've played
-not contributing to this game
-requesting a lawyer /jk
-thinking he's a ghost
leth is guilty for
-voting on someone after arguments saying that we shouldn't vote him because Pyure did
-not contributing to any game I've played
-not contributing to this game
-requesting a lawyer /jk
-thinking he's a ghost
leth is guilty for
-voting on someone after arguments saying that we shouldn't vote him because Pyure did
I'm fine (for now) with your judgment about leth being guilty (pyure may desagree, but thats up to him shall he want to defend him), however we should give sgbros the bless of the doubt. Being quiet and letting time go by is his playstyle, does nothing and gets killed/lynched. Instead of outright sending him to jail what about giving him a day or two so he can talk and contribute? Then if he refuses to do so I'll be obliged to accept his guiltyness for lack of interest.
The prosecutors did choose sgbros because he's an easy target to be considered guilty since he can't even defend himself most of the times. Basically, they know he's a bad talker and did so purposefully. They do not care if sgbros is a murderer or not, they just want to fulfill their win condition the easiest way, which is of course, by accusing the ones that often stay silent.
Now, should this type of "guilty because quiet" arise again, give them the opportunity to talk for a day or two. Then only judge them guilty if they refuse to do so.
My judgement is that sgbros is innocent.
Lethosos judgement may come later.
The prosecutors did choose sgbros because he's an easy target to be considered guilty since he can't even defend himself most of the times. Basically, they know he's a bad talker and did so purposefully. They do not care if sgbros is a murderer or not, they just want to fulfill their win condition the easiest way, which is of course, by accusing the ones that often stay silent.
Now, should this type of "guilty because quiet" arise again, give them the opportunity to talk for a day or two. Then only judge them guilty if they refuse to do so.
My judgement is that sgbros is innocent.
Lethosos judgement may come later.
"Zero proof" is never a fair excuse in Mafia. The whole point is throwing mud around and doing your best, not making everyone equivalent and RNGing them to death.
No such thing as first days in Mafia. Do your best.
That was Vike.
As if you remembered "civilized time" comments from me
edit: huh, my comment here got truncated? anyway, Real, you know you're gonna get put on the stand tonight for insta-bandwagoning with absolutely zero good reason to do so?