Tinker's construct has a fun recipe for steel, whereby 1 iron + 4 coal = 2 ingots of steel (In Direwolf20 pack in any event).
Unfortunately this doesn't play nicely with modpacks such as Direwolf20 that utilize the Blast Furnace.
After some scanning around here I found I could disable the dust recipe entirely, but that gives you more of an Unhinged problem where you really need to fiddle to get your steel (either ignite your nether portal through odd means, or dig up steel at a village/dimension/temple)
I think the perfect comprimise for me would be if a steel dust produced 2 steel nuggets (or even 1) instead of 2 steel ingots. This would make the Blast Furnace investment make sense. Is this the sort of change I could somehow make myself via config files? Or do I need to beg/bribe mr mDiyo to provide such a config option?
This would only be sensible for scenarios where you have a Blast Furnace recipe that you do not want totally deprecated; any other time, the existing recipe is perfectly reasonable.
tl;dr, I know.
Unfortunately this doesn't play nicely with modpacks such as Direwolf20 that utilize the Blast Furnace.
After some scanning around here I found I could disable the dust recipe entirely, but that gives you more of an Unhinged problem where you really need to fiddle to get your steel (either ignite your nether portal through odd means, or dig up steel at a village/dimension/temple)
I think the perfect comprimise for me would be if a steel dust produced 2 steel nuggets (or even 1) instead of 2 steel ingots. This would make the Blast Furnace investment make sense. Is this the sort of change I could somehow make myself via config files? Or do I need to beg/bribe mr mDiyo to provide such a config option?
# Configuration file
####################
# crafting BasicComponents.cfg
####################
crafting {
B:"Allow item.basiccomponents:dustSteel Crafting"=true
B:"Allow tile.basiccomponents:copperWire Crafting"=true
}
####################
# item
####################
item {
I:copperWire=3972
I:dustSteel=13987
}
This would only be sensible for scenarios where you have a Blast Furnace recipe that you do not want totally deprecated; any other time, the existing recipe is perfectly reasonable.
tl;dr, I know.