I never have the spare inventory to make use of it. But hey, if it works for you, more the power to yapocket crafting table is perfect for my needs, just saying
I never have the spare inventory to make use of it. But hey, if it works for you, more the power to ya
Which pretty much describes the whole mod, with the possible exception of the barrels.
Which also suck horribly when compared to Forestry Backpacks. If you can use 'em? Fine. But if you can convince five other people to use 'em, you should make a career of politics.most of my inventory lives in an ender pouch
FIFY.Not hardly. The routers are thebestworst thing about the mod. Just, the routers don't work the best forbarrelsanything.
Say what you will, but Redpower at least works, which is more than I can say for Factorization. I will grant you that AE is pretty much everything Logistics Pipes wishes it was, but exceedingly expensive for using it for all the things I would use RP2 for. Plus, still can't lay a hand on frames. Or Redwire. Or Logic Gates.For that, use immibis infinitubes or AE. Or the inferior, laggy, choice used by people stuck in 2011 and unable to progress to the present, redpower.
If you are playing with AE, then Routersare acompletewaste of a block IDare literally the best way to access large banks of identical machines.For that matter, RP2 doesa MUCH betterliterally the worst job at sorting things.
Which also suck horribly when compared to Forestry Backpacks. If you can use 'em? Fine. But if you can convince five other people to use 'em, you should make a career of politics.
FIFY.
If you are playing with AE, then Routers are a complete waste of a block ID. For that matter, RP2 does a MUCH better job at sorting things. I have yet to see a practical application for a router that I could not do better with chests and RP2. As far as I am concerned, DW20 ended up with a decided DOWNgrade when he switched to the router setup.
And there's really zero use for it outside of barrels. For automated smelting operations? RP2 + TE work *MUCH* better. Or AE, if you prefer.
Say what you will, but Redpower at least works, which is more than I can say for Factorization. I will grant you that AE is pretty much everything Logistics Pipes wishes it was, but exceedingly expensive for using it for all the things I would use RP2 for. Plus, still can't lay a hand on frames. Or Redwire. Or Logic Gates.
Umm... what precisely does this contraption do again?No, Fixed that for you
View attachment 3469
The routers are filled/emptied underneath. Two routers to fill them with input items - could be one, but I split so I can process two different inputs - Rubber wood and spider eyes in this block of machines. One router to fill all 22 with empty cells. One router to extract from all 22.
(128EU, the output of a LV transformer, powers 22 machines with a small extra buffer - there is no real reason 3 routers couldn't handle literally hundreds of identical machines.)
Of course, you could also just build a few geothermals and hook them up to a liquid tesseract to produce more power in the same footprint.
This post also answer any and all questions regarding chrome for fusion if coupled with a witch spawner.No, Fixed that for you
View attachment 3469
The routers are filled/emptied underneath. Two routers to fill them with input items - could be one, but I split so I can process two different inputs - Rubber wood and spider eyes in this block of machines. One router to fill all 22 with empty cells. One router to extract from all 22.
(128EU, the output of a LV transformer, powers 22 machines with a small extra buffer - there is no real reason 3 routers couldn't handle literally hundreds of identical machines.)
You're right in your surmise that that particular machine produces methane. You completely failed to go one step further and realize what other uses it could have AND what amazing scaleability said machine has. You just can't replicate that any other way.Umm... what precisely does this contraption do again?
Of course, you could also just build a few geothermals and hook them up to a liquid tesseract to produce more power in the same footprint.
I find this particularly amusing, considering all of this can be consolidated easily.I find ender pouches much better than forestry backpacks myself, I also use redpower2 canvas sacks and other ender pouches within my ender pouch.
Main pouch (diamonded if on a server) all stuff goes in here apart from armour I'm wearing, 4 or 5 main tools, a stack of steak, some torches and, of course, my pocket crafting table.
Things in main pouch:
filler, redstone energy cell, somem landmakrs, redstone torch, wraith eye and ender pearls, minium stone, buckets and:
2nd ender pouch: coloured same as my sorting system input so I can sort things while out in the world
3rd ender pouch: linked to my charge-o-mat auto recharge station to charge any chargeable thing on me in seconds
1st canvas bag: tools - all my spare tools, weapons etc; shears, portal gun, eu-reader, sonic screwdriver, beealizer...
2nd canvas bag: mystcraft - linking books, stands, a notebook for collecting pages
3rd canvas bag: misc
I used to carry 2 forestry packs (miner and digger) but never needed them so they're in a chest.
Point of my story: forestry backpacks while fine for you are totally surplus to requirements for me, it's fun that we're not all exactly the same
Better to just hook them up straight and save yourself the blown up diamond block.Finally, couple of router uses that I like:
export bus -> router -> several machines -> router -> import bus
input/output using same face of matter fab
That's a lot of quartz and power wasted on nothing. Especially if you want to scale into 100ths of machines. More than triple the footprint as well.Better to just hook them up straight and save yourself the blown up diamond block.
You also have no need to either. Your point?You're right in your surmise that that particular machine produces methane. You completely failed to go one step further and realize what other uses it could have AND what amazing scaleability said machine has. You just can't replicate that any other way.
Eh, I don't much care for anything about IC2 anymore. TE has better ore processing. MPS has better gear. There's not much point to generating EU's anymore.Geothermal is newb power. For newbs. By newbs. And if I was worried about footprint....I wouldn't have such a big base.
Footprints in a 3d environment are also 3d. You can't eliminate your footprint by going vertical, you just shift it onto your y axis.Hell, if I was worried about footprint, I could have gone vertical with the machines ...and still could, without changing any wiring except power.
Heh, now you're just being difficult because why? Oh bad bad mod made you explode a block of diamond, is that it?You also have no need to either. Your point?
You also have no need to either. Your point?
Eh, I don't much care for anything about IC2 anymore. TE has better ore processing.
Footprints in a 3d environment are also 3d. You can't eliminate your footprint by going vertical, you just shift it onto your y axis.
GT... eh, that's a whole 'nother debate. Suffice to say, it simply doesn't interest me. It tried to be entertaining, but it failed entirely due to the wrist-wracking subcombines needed to make... well... anything.In the first hour, sure. GT has the best ore processing in FTB, and if there's any mod anywhere that's better I don't know of it.
If you want to wait a couple of months for it all to get done...Except for tin. Factorization process is better for tin.
More along the lines of 'let's blow up a diamond to do things I can already do, but also crappier and with a greater chance of getting clogged up at a moment's notice'.Heh, now you're just being difficult because why? Oh bad bad mod made you explode a block of diamond, is that it?
I think your definition of 'scalability' and mine are different. I think your definition of 'scalability' is my definition of 'computer meltdown'. At least if we're talking hundreds to thousands of machines being run simultaneously.One of the nice things about said build is that you could build it in a compact clump, heck, even a cube if you found a way to power the machines. But really, the scaleability is great because it allows you to make your systems much more dynamic, you can add and remove machines as is needed with no additional pipes or tubes or busses or anything.
Pretty much.Ah, I'm just ruining my keyboard on a hater for no real purpose.
Ditto.Whoop, back to playing.
And you're taking FAR too many things with you wherever you go.
If you want to wait a couple of months for it all to get done...
More along the lines of 'let's blow up a diamond to do things I can already do, but also crappier and with a greater chance of getting clogged up at a moment's notice'.
I think your definition of 'scalability' and mine are different. I think your definition of 'scalability' is my definition of 'computer meltdown'. At least if we're talking hundreds to thousands of machines being run simultaneously.
To each their own. I can't stand IC2 anymore, much less GT
coming out of your fusion reactor.