Personally, I prefer custom tech tree and reshaped gameplay. The basics of MC bore me.
Really stupid things that people have said about Modded MC(Off topicness makes moderators tired)
- Thread starter Qazplm601
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
- Status
Celestialphoenix
Too Much Free Time
In all honesty its another statistic to throw at people idiots for clickbait.
Yeah, if you fall for this- you're part of the problem.
And its starting to give a bad rep to those who do it right.
250 mods!!
500000 downloads!!
100s of custom recipes!!
500000 downloads!!
100s of custom recipes!!
Yeah, if you fall for this- you're part of the problem.
And its starting to give a bad rep to those who do it right.
Well, my system works wonderfully. It works by scanning the Minetweaker scripts, and if it finds a line that a mod has requested to be disallowed (eg RotaryCraft requests "no new recipes" for bedrock ingots, as well as a handful of other gating items), it comments out the line and calls /mt reload, effectively removing the change. It will also log a console message to ensure noone bothers StanHebben about this, reporting the "self-commenting code line".
Okay...is there no cleaner way of doing that?
I guess there are ways of circumventing that
Shame really. I can see the point of what reika is doing but this will prob make me not playing the mods.
Well, that's one way to do it... Might not be a bad idea to insert another comment with the same info as the console log message (which I imagine to be something like "You're trying to break Rotarycraft progression by introducing an alternate recipe for a gating item! Stop it!"), just in case people try to report it without reading the log first. And judging by the amount of nonsense that shows up in my logfiles, your message might not be easy to find.Well, my system works wonderfully. It works by scanning the Minetweaker scripts, and if it finds a line that a mod has requested to be disallowed (eg RotaryCraft requests "no new recipes" for bedrock ingots, as well as a handful of other gating items), it comments out the line and calls /mt reload, effectively removing the change. It will also log a console message to ensure noone bothers StanHebben about this, reporting the "self-commenting code line".
This reminds me of something someone said in the ChromatiCraft thread when you explained how you keep tile entity movers from corrupting worlds when used on pylons. Aggressive bugsquashing at its finest.
Celestialphoenix
Too Much Free Time
So this only affects people adding recipes for RoC items?
-would be be allowed to add RoC items into other mods recipes?
(such as changing the Buildcraft quarry to use RoC diamond/HSLA gears?)
-would be be allowed to add RoC items into other mods recipes?
(such as changing the Buildcraft quarry to use RoC diamond/HSLA gears?)
Going by his rules, I think that'd be okay, since you're not adding an alternative recipe for RoC's gears, just using them in the context of other mods' recipes. So long as you don't add a method to create bedrock ingots from, let's say, XU bedrockium, or allowing a machine to create ethanol crystals, or something of that nature.
Honestly, I don't see why you'd want to edit RotaryCraft's recipes and mechanics. They're so well-done that it'd be like drawing a happy face in felt-tip marker on Starry Night.
Celestialphoenix
Too Much Free Time
The gears thing is so theres only 1 type of each gear, rather than 3 or 4.
I wish I could put this in my sig.
Correct. You can add recipes using my items as much as you like.
Probably a good idea.
...So my blocking you from adding new recipes for gating materials - and destroying the techtree - is enough to make you stop using the mod?
The implications of your saying that bother me.
You can...
Can you think of a cleaner way?
I doubt it.
Last edited:
Sig length limit. He can't change his sig without removing 90% of it.
I have to disagree; not seeing the signature inline with the posts not only takes some of the impact away, but makes it much less accessible and likely to be read.@Celestialphoenix do what I do
Celestialphoenix do what I do
Not many people will hit a link though.
Edit: Wow, Reika with the ninja today.
But siggys clutter up forums
My way makes it a nice two lines of non-clutter. Also, not many people read siggys in the first place. Even if they aren't behind a linkWell yeah...
Celestialphoenix
Too Much Free Time
Thats why its in a spoiler tag
Also adblock is useful for targeting the more annoying signatures- so I don't see any of those dragon eggs.
I can't believe I didn't think of that before. Thanks for that info, time to go block stuff.
Well my way you can have as many lines as you wantThats why its in a spoiler tag
- Status