Demosthenex
New Member
Feel free to post to the wiki if you like.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yup, i meant i would love one for this xdI think that's the RF generator, not the HP turbine.
Yes. Since they only transfer steam between each other if there is a difference greater than four units, more complex and/or longer piping means more "pressure" is required to drive steam through the lines.Does the topology of the steam lines matter? I know you can get steam "stuck" sometimes if you alter then while running, but these started new and empty. Do steam lines have to balance? Are there issues combining outputs?
Not unless the boiler is of the wrong type for the reactor.Do boilers also react with neutrons? I had the impression only the cores did. If so that could explain the reduced efficiency in some configurations where the neutron had to travel through too many potential obstacles between the core and the reflector.
20C for uranium fuel and 30C for plutonium fuel.How much heat is generated when a core does interact with a neutron?
25% if loaded with fuel, 0% if empty. Note that if the core is full of nuclear waste, the neutron may be absorbed yet generate no fission event.What is the chance of a neutron passing through a core interacting with it?
No, 75% of neutrons are simply absorbed.Are reflectors always 100% effective?
If you know Java, I strongly recommend reading the "onNeutron" function in each of the relevant reactor TileEntity classes, which is fired each time a neutron impacts the block.
Yes. Since they only transfer steam between each other if there is a difference greater than four units, more complex and/or longer piping means more "pressure" is required to drive steam through the lines.
No, 75% of neutrons are simply absorbed.
Yes. The pipe pump also helps.What would you recommend then in regard to the steam lines given you must aggregate the output from the boilers to power something as large as the HP turbine? Would straight lines be preferred to grids? Minimize junctions?
Correct.To be clear a reflector will never allow a neutron to pass through, it will be reflected with a 25% chance or absorbed?
You are in luck: Cutting the turbine length reduces the torque (and thus power) output by a simple ratio, and has no other effects, so you can simply divide by the same ratio to get the "theoretical" total energy.Please bear with me as I have discovered that some of my power output measurements are inaccurate due to size of the HP turbine I used. They are not completely off, but I have to go back and inventory where I used a maximum size HP turbine vs a 3 or 4 block version. I discovered this while comparing the output for the same reactor design in anoter build, and got significantly less power. In debugging the turbine was larger on the first.
For the columns of like design, those numbers are good because they all used the same 3 block HP turbine. Single reactors are not reliable.
I'm going back to try and setup a standardized way to measure output. I'm already using a bedrock industrial coil to store output for one hour to base my numbers on, and I'm trying to nail down the conversion from the coil to kilowatt hours as I think sustained output is a better measure than spot checking the MW.
@Override
protected double getEfficiency() {
switch(this.getNumberStagesTotal()) {
case 1:
return 0.0125;
case 2:
return 0.025;
case 3:
return 0.075;
case 4:
return 0.125;
case 5:
return 0.25;
case 6:
return 0.5;
case 7:
return 1;
default:
return 0;
}
}
So folks given Reika's list of HP turbine efficiencies and my frequent testing with 3 deep turbines, that means all of my numbers are taken with a 7.5% efficiency. This represents a huge underreporting of the potential power done during testing for convenience.
That means the little 6 core reactor design that reached 28 GWh at 7.5% efficiency could reach 373 GWh (avg output of 106 MW/s) with a full size HP turbine at 100% efficiency.
I find that number to be enormous! I'll setup a test with a full HP turbine to confirm.
It would be fun if you could also leave us an approximation of the torque and speed it produces
Also, did you try them with one/multiple LP turbine? It might be beneficial for smaller reactors (I think, not totaly sure about that)
This is true for both turbine types.So I think the HP turbine as a fixed max speed, and dynamic torque.
I will fix this.I was just made aware on IRC that the vertically tiled multiblock reactors are NOT pushing the waste down to the bottom for extraction even though the fuel pellets do move to the bottom and populate all of the cores. I'm on 23c still.
Be aware this can completely ruin the output from the taller reactors and invalidates my testing results of the vertically tiled cores.
Nice catch DevonX!
Bad idea. They like to forcibly stack the waste inside the containers, leading to rapid overheating.item ducts work fine for transporting the waste to them.