PSA: Monster 1.0.6 and 1.0.7 Hotfix

[SatanicSanta]

Just an off-topic question. Is there a way to tell right off the bat if a mod (any mod) supports that feature or not?

I'm fairly certain all mods support it.

 

[Lathanael]

I'm fairly certain all mods support it.

Wrong

Just an off-topic question. Is there a way to tell right off the bat if a mod (any mod) supports that feature or not?

Unfortunately not otherwise Eyamaz and we(as in rest of the modpack team) wouldn't wish all mods supporting it. Some modders reference it in the documentation but for most it's either an undocumented feature or not working at all

 

[Siro]

Wrong

Unfortunately not otherwise Eyamaz and we(as in rest of the modpack team) wouldn't wish all mods supporting it. Some modders reference it in the documentation but for most it's either an undocumented feature or not working at all

For the mods that have readable source code available, they'll have something along the lines of

if (!id==0)

in their configuration code which basically says, if the id isn't 0, do this code to register the mod-added stuff. Mods without ID configs will definitely not have this feature at all. Some mods don't like turning off individual features so they explicitly don't support it.

 

[Kahless61]

I think it would look more like
if (id != 0)

 

[GreatOrator]

I think it would look more like
if (id != 0)

Actually, no, the way it is written makes sense. It is basically saying (in layman's terms) if the id is equal to 0 then do whatever. It is checking for the zero before processing that particular block, item, etc.

So most likely the entire function reads something similar to run the function if id is NOT 0.

 

[Nerixel]

Actually, no, the way it is written makes sense. It is basically saying (in layman's terms) if the id is equal to 0 then do whatever. It is checking for the zero before processing that particular block, item, etc.

So most likely the entire function reads something similar to run the function if id is NOT 0.

"if(id != 0)" is how you check if something is not equal to something else in Java. "if(!id==0)" errored when I tested it.

 

[GreatOrator]

if you look at the original post, he is not saying that is the only thing on the line, only that they contain something like that. In creating a complete function that would most certainly be the correct context if they are trying to determine if a particular item is needed by simply stating do not use this id if it is equal to 0.

Now it may be something I am missing with java, but programming in general that would be a proper syntax.

 

[Kahless61]

You would have to use more parenthesis in that case to enclose the comparison, since inversion (the !) gets evaluated first.
if(!(id==0))
Which makes for more confusing code, but some programmers are more confusing.
I'm a java, php, and C programmer, btw.

 

[Siro]

"if(id != 0)" is how you check if something is not equal to something else in Java. "if(!id==0)" errored when I tested it.

It wasn't meant to be literal code. One can go get the code snippet from OpenBlocks if one wishes.

 

[Nerixel]

We need to get back on topic, any second a moderator's gonna come in here and slap us all, but the code syntax was all Kahless was trying to correct (I think). The meaning of the statement itself was correct.

 

[Eyamaz]

Your right. This thread isn't needed any more.