It's although it's having trouble pumping the energy across the chunk border, for whatever reason. If you add a few (ok, several) more gold pipes leading from that one to the spare side of the energy cell, do they blow too?
Interesting. I'm not entirely sure why it's only that one block and not the rest, it seems like the cube input rate isn't keeping up so it's just backing up at the first in line. Honestly, again I suggest just making one long line, or at the very least so you don't run out of platform space there just stack them directly on top of each other so it's kind of like this
engine -wood
engine -wood -conductive
Or just make conduits >_>
It's although it's having trouble pumping the energy across the chunk border, for whatever reason. If you add a few (ok, several) more gold pipes leading from that one to the spare side of the energy cell, do they blow too?
And just to top off the redstone Energy Conduit love, you'll be glad to know that coming to FTB soon (eventually) is Redstone Energy Framework. Once MJ is converted to this framework, transmission is lossless. 5% loss on conversion.
What this means I've no idea, changelogs 4tw
Is it because the bottom wooden pipe connects to the engine? I thought the energy won't go that way, but guess I was wrong
thanks, I'll try fixing this.
Huh? I don't think I get what you mean by this. And I decided not to use conduits because they have a 5% loss while the pipes have a much less loss over shorter distances. My last resort to these problems are changing it to all conduits, but I just prefer not to
How I read it when energy gets put into the framework it has a 5% loss, any energy transferred within the network is lossless (so no energy loss from going conduit > energy cell > conduit), and it's not clarified if there will be loss when it exits the framework system (such as conduits > machine, or conduit > converter). TE engines are part of the framework so they won't lose power if pumping directly into the network via conduits or energy cells. There isn't specific mention of energy tesseracts and if they're on the network, though it can be assumed they are while still keeping the 25% transfer cost.
5 percent loss over the entire line is negligable, especially compared to the other advantages that conduits have (less laggy, better looking, never ever explode etc)Is it because the bottom wooden pipe connects to the engine? I thought the energy won't go that way, but guess I was wrong
thanks, I'll try fixing this.
Huh? I don't think I get what you mean by this. And I decided not to use conduits because they have a 5% loss while the pipes have a much less loss over shorter distances. My last resort to these problems are changing it to all conduits, but I just prefer not to
Are you 100% sure about this? I swear I read King Lemming post saying that wasn't true, but can't find it now.You get punished again for T-junctions
Are you 100% sure about this? I swear I read King Lemming post saying that wasn't true, but can't find it now.