Cough* https://plus.google.com/113074449898382436082/posts/MNbioAvKKiH * Cough
I think this is inefficient,since more lasers = faster
I know Hack Overkilled it,but I don't care(If he didn't this,I would later)Jezus Christ man. Just... dang .
Oh,I usually just leave some at stock,I usually don't use gates THAT oftenI know, but I needed to separate materials in order to automate it using AE. One table ONLY creates chipsets. The other make gates and pipe wire. This was my solution to allow me to request things from my AE system and let this do the rest. Since pipe wire and chip sets share the same materials, I had no way of telling the table which one I wanted, rather it would alternate between the two recipes. This would mean that my requests would never be exactly what I asked for.
Yea a diamond chipset in just less than 4 seconds! I wonder if 300 lasers is the max you can fit in the detection radius..Jezus Christ man. Just... dang .
That's cool and all, but I just don't get what sort of setup requires that many lasers/chipsets/gates/whatever it is.
Well, a massive Molecular Assembly Chamber for example, think 8x, or 16x.
What's the biggest size MAC anyway?
Oh... I've never once used an assembly table for building AE stuff... the web page does say it's cheaper, so maybe I should.
Biggest MAC, I dunno, the web page doesn't say for biggest. Only smallest size is specified, at 3x3x3.
It costs a lot more energy to use the assembly table but you do save a few raw materials. However, it takes a lot longer to make them use the assembly table as well. My 1st AE build I used a similar setup to automate AE. Every build since then I just use the MAC to create the processor needed then bake in one of the furnaces.
With those 300 lasers you can get a basic proccesser in just under 1.5 seconds. Well worth it if your willing to house all those lasers.