[1.5.2] UsefulRecipes - Adds some useful recipes to the game!
- Thread starter OmegaPython
- Start date
-
The FTB Forum is now read-only, and is here as an archive. To participate in our community discussions, please join our Discord! https://ftb.team/discord
Yeah uh... NO
Anyone know how to link into a mod but not rely on it? I'm trying to add a recipe for the new BC plugs that doesn't require the assembly table. I'm probably just really noob, but can anyone help?
couldn't you do an if statement?
Like if ____ mod is installed then gameregistry.addrecipe(itemname) or something like that
Although I don't really know. I myself am working on making an addon but can't figure out how to get the ic2 api decompiled so yea if anyone could help
That bit isn't a problem though. FML is getting stuck on my import:couldn't you do an if statement?
Like if ____ mod is installed then gameregistry.addrecipe(itemname) or something like that
Although I don't really know. I myself am working on making an addon but can't figure out how to get the ic2 api decompiled so yea if anyone could help
Code:
import buildcraft.BuildCraftTransport;OK I'm just completely confused now xD
Clearly you are more advanced at programming and I can't understand what you are talking about
Sorry :/ I tried
I highly doubt I am more advanced than you. Do you not have something like this at the beginning of your code?OK I'm just completely confused now xD
Clearly you are more advanced at programming and I can't understand what you are talking about
Sorry :/ I tried
Code:
import buildcraft.BuildCraftTransport;
import net.minecraft.block.Block;
import net.minecraft.item.Item;
import net.minecraft.item.ItemStack;
import net.minecraftforge.common.Configuration;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.Mod;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.Mod.Init;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.Mod.PostInit;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.Mod.PreInit;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.event.FMLInitializationEvent;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.event.FMLPostInitializationEvent;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.event.FMLPreInitializationEvent;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.network.NetworkMod;
import cpw.mods.fml.common.registry.GameRegistry;Yes I have something like that...
As to why it's crashing maybe you didn't import it correctly? Did you type it out or Ctrl shift o?
Maybe you don't have the API installed correctly
No. You might want to look into Java classloading. Import doesn't actually do anything; it just tells the VM what you mean with you say "new MyClass" when you instantiate a new object.
The name 'import' is a rather poor choice (in hindsight). It's only a namespace reference. packages are namespaces and import just tells that you are referencing "mymod.somepackagename.MyClass" instead of "someothermod.otherpackagename.MyClass". This is because class names don't have to be unique but packagenames do have to be.
To see if another mod is available all you need to do is use reflection to try to load a class from that mod. If it works it means the mod is there (it might not have loaded but you know it's in the classpath). If it fails to reference the name you know for sure that the mod isn't loaded.
How do you load a class? You use the class object, like this (by heart):
Class.forName("buildcraftpackage.someotherpackage.BuildCraftPipe");
It will throw a ClassNotFoundException if that class does not exist within the classpath. If it succeeds you know it's there. This is the easiest way to discover if other mods are there and act accordingly.
Like I said, the example is by heart, look at the Java docs for more info.[DOUBLEPOST=1368443324][/DOUBLEPOST]
That's why you don't reference class that might not be there. Ever. For this kind of stuff you need reflection.
You can use a Wool Card from RP2 to make string from wool. It's not on the FTB wiki but it's on the RP recipe list. Not sure how many string you get.
Yo trying to add recipes to spawn eggs but for the life of me can't find the name for it. Looked in blocks and items and still couldn't find it...
Also do these recipes seem fair? By fair meaning hard enough. No I won't make them easier only harder
>: D
Also do these recipes seem fair? By fair meaning hard enough. No I won't make them easier only harder
>: D
Code:
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.record13, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockGold});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordCat, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#',Block.blockEmerald});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordBlocks, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.brick});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordChirp, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockRedstone});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordFar, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockIron});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordMall, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockDiamond});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordMellohi, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.beacon});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordStal, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.dragonEgg});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordStrad, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockNetherQuartz});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordWard, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Item.expBottle});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.record11, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Item.netherStar});
GameRegistry.addRecipe(new ItemStack(Item.recordWait, 1), new Object []{"OOO", "O#O", "OOO", "O", Block.obsidian, '#', Block.blockLapis});Spawn eggs: Item.monsterPlacer (I think)
If you won't make them easier, then don't change them. I think I might have to make non-GT versions of some of your recipes XD.
Those recipies should not be in a game. The whole point of some stuff is that it's rare or has to be found. None of the items you use aren't easy to get. You're basically providing creative mode to players. Bit like the rediculous dragon egg recipy Xeno's gives.
What's the problem with having more than one dragon egg? Oh, I guess there's the GT energy thing but I don't use GT so its only use to me would be to Feed The Bees. I agree that there's no need for survival players to get hold of spawn eggs.[DOUBLEPOST=1368520981][/DOUBLEPOST]
One of the records needs a brick, another needs an Enderdragon Egg? The Enderdragon Egg, for a record? Sure, it can be duplicated with Xeno's (if you have that mod), but still, the records are pretty trivial to collect with careful placing of a Skeleton spawner and a Creeper spawner. I got a full set of records by accident on Skyblock.
That's one major issue: you're basically giving people 128 mj/t for the price of 8 diamond blocks. Completely rediculous. There's stuff in vanilla that is more or less endless (like diamonds), there's stuff that's in theory limitless but quite some work to get (nether stars) and then there's stuff that's supposed to be 100% unique like the dragon egg. It's completely idiotic to allow players to simply dupe that kind of stuff because it completely throws any sense of what's rare and what's not out of the window.
EE2 did this, EE3 does this and hey what a surprise, so does Xeno's.
Finding / getting stuff like the dragon egg or the records is fun BECAUSE you can't craft them. What's the point of mods like Thaumcraft that add dungeons if every single item in those dungeons can be easily crafted? Recipies like these (no matter what mod they're from) tend to make the hard work of a lot of other mod authors completely pointless.
You can only have one egg on a energy thing... More than one will blow up
And spawn eggs I guess will be removed.
And spawn eggs I guess will be removed.