Search results

Oh does it now, OK then. I found your thread over on the IC2 forum about this (versions 1445-1481 affected): http://forum.industrial-craft.net/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=11488 From my readings on the shaders mod forum, up to forge version 1469 can be used without problem. It is claimed...

So, I got the shaders mod and SEUS working with this pack but I had to downgrade forge... Is there a specific reason why 1490 is being used? I downgraded this pack to 1448 and everything appears fine. 1448 is required by the shaders mod and it also appears to be the highest recommended too. I...

I am going to link this here again as it is invaluable and explains the entire powertrain needed.

Also, on the concept of hiding NEI entries, minetweaker cannot hide things with null metadata; withTag({}). INpureCore can. I was able to hide the last few bits of mekanism using INpureCore. I wanted to pass that along in case that has been an issue.

The single IC2 solar panel that shows up in NEI for me (it is the 1 EU/t one) has no recipe associated with it... hover over it and press r, not sure if that is intended or not. If it is, could we get that NEI entry hidden? I even removed my mekanism.zs file just in case it was in some way...

On the RTG debate... solar panels are disabled in this pack... why aren't RTG's? It is my personal belief that in a hardcore pack, nothing should be infinite or free. Everything should have an ongoing maintenance cost be that parts, fuel or energy. Nothing should be gated by time alone. Even...

Have you seen MysteryDump's setup? I linked a video in a while back. She has cooling towers that are compact and snazy looking making this power-train really nice. Here is the video again to make it easy :) A build video of one of those towers is here too: This is the reason I want those...

Fair point. I have no idea if disabling passive reactors is even possible. Also, doing out the math a bit more: a good reactor design generate 1000 Hu/t so, roughly, 500 EU/t (i believe it is a 1 : 1 ratio for Hu to mb steam) a normal LPB generates 360 mb/t so; 200 EU/t using 1 turbine a normal...

Well, the no direct power from bigreactors is already set so I am guessing you are in disagreement with the disablement of direct EU from a standard IC2 reactor. My thoughts are this: reactors work on steam IRL, so why not emulate that. IC2 has a version that produces steam; in a roundabout way...

I guess my point is, it is much easier to create railcraft steam and use the turbines then it is to create the IC2 reactor and use the steam generator -> kenetic generator combo. Given that the cost/complexity of each setup is not 1 : 1, the quantity of the steam units per EU should not be 1 : 1...

But 450 EU/t out of a reactor is really nothing when compared to 200 EU/t out of a railcraft turbine... concepts of scalability work against the reactor in this case. Now, if I could run 10 turbines off the steam output of a 5x5 IC2 liquid reactor (assume this is what you meant by the actively...

I have actually always thought IC2 nuclear output to be too low compared with other EU/t generation options especially when you take into consideration cost/complexity. I tend to avoid it in packs I play as I find scaled early game power gen (charcoal farm) good enough. In my opinion, maybe a...

I was really hung up on mekanism's processing chain as well. I really like the complexity required to get to 5x. Then I started looking into gregtech's processing chain: http://ftb.gamepedia.com/GregTech_5/Mining_and_Processing#Early_game_processing and https://imgur.com/a/StuM8 I realized...

Awesome, thank you. Pneumaticcraft has some fancy toys now. The last time I played with it drones were new.

Oh dear, please explain... I have heard of this mentioned before but I have never seen it.

Well, I could change the recipe to require enderium instead of steal... Sort of make mekanism pipes a natural progression above enderIO pipes if/when they are needed. The first crafting recipe is 2 steal and a bucket right now (default). So, from highest tier enderIO fluid conduit to lowest...

I am trying to work within the progression system. Those pipes are completely configurable in the config as far as rates are concerned and creating them requires steal, first upgrade requires iron+redstone in an alloy furnace, second upgrade requires the previous and diamond dust in an alloy...

I have used EnderIO in the past and greatly appreciate the singleblock/multipurpose capabilities it's pipes offer. I have 2 gripes with it though. It makes the pipes small and necessitates opaqueness; I really like to see the liquids/items in pipes. The second gripe is that they do not flow very...

Just started messing about with the pack, it is near perfect for me :) I also just discovered PFAA geologica... I was hoping to use it on my server (private only). What configuration are you speaking of here? Would simply dropping it in have adverse effects? I am also modifying the pack a bit...

OK. I was simply wondering because your EDIT2 stated that you would update without GT6...Hence the confusion. I'll download and startup a world today and report back if I find anything weird. I will be modifying the pack a little bit though; adding project red, removing bluepower, updating...