Trials of Murder [GAME THREAD]

[goreae]

Okay...

So probably worthwhile voting for somebody other than whoever Pyure's trying to investigate (and then acquit). Ordinarily, I'd be all over Pyure for pulling something like that, but... nope.

I'll think on it.

Oh, and all votes are permanent. Keep that in mind.

 

[SpwnX]

can't you change them during the day?

Also, i'm looking at the people that are not being active: SoraZodia, Nojr, theJ, dragon and eruantien. Not much, but better keep an eye to the ones who just consent to everything.

 

[goreae]

can't you change them during the day?

Also, i'm looking at the people that are not being active: SoraZodia, Nojr, theJ, dragon and eruantien. Not much, but better keep an eye to the ones who just consent to everything.

On the first day, you must make two votes for the people who you think are the best players. This vote MAY NOT BE CHANGED.
On the second day, you can vote for one person who you think might be guilty to put on trial. THIS VOTE CANNOT BE CHANGED. Roles are handed out at the start of this day.
After this, you can vote for the two people on trial as 'guilty' or 'innocent', and carry on putting people on trial. THESE VOTES CANNOT BE CHANGED.

 

[sgbros1]

I am a spooOoky ghooOst.

Oh wait this isn't gor's game? Oh well.

 

[Pyure]

The defense is accusing him.

Family looking funny at me cuz i lol'd irl.

I honestly have no idea what's going on this game.

- Rather than a normal lynch, we choose somebody to interrogate and then decide to lynch them (or not) the next day.
- Pyure and SpwnX want each day's interrogatee to not be lynched.
-- As such, they'd be liable to nominate somebody they think to be innocent and easy to defend.
- Vike and Shazam want each day's interrogatee to be lynched.
-- As such, they're actually looking for suspicious players, who will be easier to lynch.
- Meanwhile, there's a few wolves running around that want everyone else dead.

Does that all sound reasonably accurate?

Notice that the prosecution's job is a lot easier since their motivation aligns with the town

Yes I suggested tossing fowltief on the stand because he had absolutely nothing suspicious about him. There's no real reason I should try to pretend that I'm going to help put suspicious people on the stand. The game seems to think I'm going to do this but there's no incentive for me to do so.

That said, as suspicious as fowltief isn't, he's still not much more inno-looking than anyone else here. Therefore, he's as good a defendant as any.

 

[Lethosos]

Originally I was gonna suggest Eru-10 for the stand as a warmup, but Pyure's explanation for fowl is just as valid, so I'll go ahead and also suggest fowl for trial.

Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2

 

[Eruantien]

Originally I was gonna suggest Eru-10 for the stand as a warmup, but Pyure's explanation for fowl is just as valid, so I'll go ahead and also suggest fowl for trial.

Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2

Originally I was gonna suggest Eru-10 for the stand as a warmup

Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2

I was gonna suggest Eru-10 for the stand

 

[VikeStep]

Originally I was gonna suggest Eru-10 for the stand as a warmup, but Pyure's explanation for fowl is just as valid, so I'll go ahead and also suggest fowl for trial.

Sent from my Puzzle Box of Yogg-Saron using Tapatalk 2

Leth, please tell us why you voted fowl. Are you aware that votes are instantly locked? Are you also aware that the vote was started because he is the least likely to be given a guilty verdict as he has done nothing wolfy?

 

[VikeStep]

Everyone must realise that a fowltief vote to put someone on trial is a very attractive vote for the wolves if fowltief is part of the town. So expect poor reasoning from those who are hopping on the fowltief wagon.

 

[VikeStep]

If fowl is town, then it is very highly likely that RJS or Leth or both are wolves.

 

[VikeStep]

In fact, even if fowl is a wolf, RJS and Leth might be wolves as they know he can be proven innocent the next day and be given more town credit.

 

[VikeStep]

Also, anyone with less than 5 posts by the end of the day will be seen as slanking so that the town has a harder time.

I demand every person post at least 5 times. We will not hold back on finding you guilty if you don't comply. Plus, it's not too much to ask.

 

[erindalc]

I've had a long day, and I'm going to do a full analysis in a few hours

 

[VikeStep]

I've had a long day, and I'm going to do a full analysis in a few hours

Thanks erindalc. Tell me your thoughts on RJS, Leth, and fowltief when you are done.

 

[Pyure]

I think its worth noting that at this point, Vike is throwing mud everywhere with reckless abandon. Everything you do is wolfy. Everything you do not do is wolfy. Everything you fail to not do is wolfy.

Just do your thing guys, don't stress it.

 

[VikeStep]

I think its worth noting that at this point, Vike is throwing mud everywhere with reckless abandon. Everything you do is wolfy. Everything you do not do is wolfy. Everything you fail to not do is wolfy.

Just do your thing guys, don't stress it.

I said what you need to do to not be wolfy. You need to post at least 5 times and you need to explain your votes if you are voting the same person as the defence.

 

[VikeStep]

In fact, always explain your votes...

 

[goreae]

Well I'm going to go ahead and vote lethosos. After all that stuff said about the fowltief wagon being completely BS, hopping on it just seemed ludicrous. Even pyure said that he didn't have anything against leth. And honestly, eruantien would've been a much better vote than fowl. Perpetuating the bandwagon just made no sense at all.

In fact, always explain your votes...

Yes, everyone should always explain your votes especially in this game. You aren't smitten for not voting, and your vote holds a much higher weight as it can't be revoked. You should be reasonably certain about your votes and be able to explain your reason behind it.

 

[Pyure]

I said what you need to do to not be have me accuse you of being wolfy. You need to post at least 5 times and you need to explain your votes if you are voting the same person as the defence.

ftfy. Also, you'll accuse people who respond too quickly of being wolfy.

 

[VikeStep]

ftfy. Also, you'll accuse people who respond too quickly of being wolfy.

No I won't. I'll vote them if it seems they are frozen. That is, too afraid to say anything at the risk of being lynched.