Will there be nuclear radiation in IC/GregTech one day?

[Kruppi]

With nuclear trash that has to be stored in a special way and stuff.
Are there ideas or plans for such a thing?

 

[brujon]

There's radiation when you don't set up your reactor correctly, and after a nuclear explosion. As far as i know, that's it.

 

[Guswut]

With nuclear trash that has to be stored in a special way and stuff.
Are there ideas or plans for such a thing?

This isn't the IC2 forums (you can find them here: http://forum.industrial-craft.net/). You should go ask over at the IC2 forums (again, here: http://forum.industrial-craft.net/) about a question related to the future of IC2. Good luck!

 

[Dravarden]

You can't write IC2 and new stuff in the same sentence.

 

[Exedra]

You can't write IC2 and new stuff in the same sentence.

You just did.

 

[Dravarden]

You just did.

sorry, I forgot the: unless is a negative sentence.

which it is, since it has a ''can't'' in there.

 

[Harvest88]

Good thing nuclear power isn't so hot these day that there 512eu/t solar panels that can be used to make more solar panels. I hate my 78eu/t Thoruim reactor that's I'm just going to put my 6 core reactor and components on the "back burner" unless they buffs it so it actually quite powerful. You can make cooling chambers for coolant cells but they're just not worth it these days. Even 4 thermal generators running on lava can beat my 78eu/t design. At least it far better than those MFFS eu generation that produce power like a couple of watermills since you have to feed more than 95% back in the system and yet burning up those forciuims.

 

[Dravarden]

Good thing nuclear power isn't so hot these day that there 512eu/t solar panels that can be used to make more solar panels. I hate my 78eu/t Thoruim reactor that's I'm just going to put my 6 core reactor and components on the "back burner" unless they buffs it so it actually quite powerful. You can make cooling chambers for coolant cells but they're just not worth it these days. Even 4 thermal generators running on lava can beat my 78eu/t design. At least it far better than those MFFS eu generation that produce power like a couple of watermills since you have to feed more than 95% back in the system and yet burning up those forciuims.

the most efficient reactor will only give you a max of like 400 eu/t.

 

[Harvest88]

Yea and they actually "burn" copper and tin for power.

 

[ILoveGregTech]

I hope GregTech adds something to where you need a hazmat suit for handling radioactive materials (like Uranium, etc.) In fact I even suggested it to him. While I like the simplicity of mods and IC2/MC in general I also like some complexity in my machines (hence GT)
But yea I was just reading on another forum about how Nuclear Power on FTB isn't real (obviously) and thought but Hey! It's MC what are you gonna do.
Sorry for this text wall

 

[Sinnaj63]

There is (radioactive) pollution planned for IC3.

 

[ILoveGregTech]

There is (radioactive) pollution planned for IC3.

IC3!?!?!

 

[Sinnaj63]

IC3!?!?!

A complete rework of IC2.

 

[Dravarden]

well, in time, when was the last time IC2 got something new? besides the nerf of the reactors...

 

[CrafterOfMines57]

A complete rework of IC2.

I think that was theoretical, as in Alblaka stated if he ever had a huge amount of free time, there might be an IC3 with new mechanics like pollution and radiation.

 

[Sinnaj63]

I think that was theoretical, as in Alblaka stated if he ever had a huge amount of free time, there might be an IC3 with new mechanics like pollution and radiation.

I did not say that it will ever get released.