Agreed.I am currently heading off to school
When I come back hopefully you'll
Have all gotten some sense
And don't make the immense
Mistake of making accusations like a fool
voting for someone as an anti-smite who already has votes on them is not good practiceThis is confusing >.<
I HAVE NO IDEA HOW THIS WORKSvoting for someone as an anti-smite who already has votes on them is not good practice
anti-smite is how we denote that we have no evidence yet and are just voting for them as a safety incase we don't get to vote. Thus if your anti-smite results in killing someone that would be...bad.I HAVE NO IDEA HOW THIS WORKS
/me dies
What does anti-smite do?
I will change anti-smite vote VikestepWait hold on... I have two anti-smites on me. Meaning that I would get smited, right? @016Nojr @Strikingwolf
oh didn't realize that oops anti-smite vote dwappoThe one-vote-per-person antismite thing? Again? The previous game showed that this method just gives all the power to the last voter.
Here, I'll give you something to talk about. @Strikingwolf! I find you to be hypocritical. You placed a so-called "antismite" vote on Vikestep, putting him at two votes total and pushing him to the lead. And you did this after correcting Gideon for the exact same thing.
I admit, it isn't much... but it's something. What else do I have to go on? My vote for Strikingwolf feels more justified than a random vote, at least.